Articles for tag: Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE ICON: ITS IMPORTANCE TO ORTHODOXY

Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The Icon: Its Importance to Orthodoxy” on March 23, 1986 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was the former abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live.

The Icon: Its Importance to Orthodoxy – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Sunday of Orthodoxy, Homily Β154


fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Today, my beloved, the first Sunday of Lent, our Church celebrates her victory of the accuracy and the correctness of her faith and her traditions.

The Church has fought long to maintain the genuine interpretation of the revealed word of God, recorded in the Holy Scripture by God-inspired men, handed down as written works and teachings within the Church. One expression, one element of Orthodoxy among many others, is the icon as theology, and as the truth of Holy Scripture, the word of God.

Why the issue of the Icon is central

The issue of the icon was fought against for one hundred and twenty years by Iconoclasm, a heresy which broke out in Byzantium. The Seventh Ecumenical Council, however, eventually brought the icons back and settled the issue theologically.

The theology of the icon is an enormous and most important issue, so important that our Church honors the Fathers of the Seventh Ecumenical Council on the first Sunday of Lent, calling it “Sunday of Orthodoxy”. Although the issue of icons is one of many issues that constitute Orthodoxy, the Fathers considered it to be the most important.

Some are surprised to hear this and say, “Can one issue out of all the issues possibly be called the most important? Why icons?” Where, then, is the importance of the whole issue? It is, of course, the most important because of one aspect of theology, to which we owe our debt of knowledge to the icon.

The icon, my beloved, makes clear that God the Word really became a true man. How does the icon express this? In that we are able to depict Jesus Christ, and also the way in which we can represent the person of Jesus Christ, because here is the whole battle, here is the whole war, here is the whole struggle – if we are able to depict God.

Yes. It is possible for us to depict God. How so? Because He became human. The theology of the icon refers to and is based on the Gospel, and is of central importance to the entire Faith: “The Word became flesh.” (John 1:14) If, then, “the Word became flesh”, that is, as long as the Son of God became human, then it is possible to depict Him.

This is why one of the hymns from today’s Orthros service says:

“We now restore the icon of Your flesh, O Lord, and give it relative reverence, and by it show forth the great mystery of Your Dispensation; for You, O Lover of mankind, truly appeared in the nature of flesh unto us, not in seeming appearance as say the sons of Manis, who oppose You. Through Your icon we are led up to a longing and love for You.”

So you see that the icon constitutes a central place, because the accepting or not accepting the icon is to ultimately accept or not accept the truth of the taking flesh of the Son of God. This is why the issue of icons is central.

And if the Word really became flesh, then man can become Word [Logos], that is, divinized. I want us to understand, my beloved, that the theology of the icon is this: “The Word became flesh so that flesh becomes Word”, as the Fathers say. God became man in order for man to become god.

The question of whether Jesus is God was raised at the First Ecumenical Council. This raises the question of whether Jesus became human, that is, if he is a true man. This subject of the deity was raised at the First Ecumenical Council with the Arius and was fought against by the 318 Fathers and St. Athanasios.

And now the question is put forward: “Did God really become a human being? We recognize His divinity, but we doubt because of His humanity. It is precisely the opposite, which is why I told you that it was, in reality, fought against, again, first with the Docetists1, and then, once more, the Church battled Monophysitism at the Seventh Ecumenical Synod over the “icon” issue.

The issue is important, because if the Son of God really did not become man, then man cannot become god. That is, the theosis [deification] of man is impossible. That is, the salvation of man is impossible. If, however, God became man, if He partook of our nature, then this closeness of His to us offers us salvation.

Because of this approach to us, that is, His taking our nature and divinizing it and ascending with it into heaven and glorifying it, this nature of ours was also made able to be glorified in the person of the Word of God and we are all able to be saved. Therefore He is our forerunner in the heavens.

If, however, He did not become man, then God was God and remained God, and nothing more, and there remains a division of essences. In other words, there would be no union of essences. The union of essences was accomplished in the person of Jesus Christ. How? Because He truly became human.

So I repeat, once again, this is what the icon expresses. Because if I am able to paint the person of Christ as an Icon, it means that He became human. If he did not become human, how can the divinity be painted? It cannot be depicted, and it is not depicted. Do you see how important an issue this is, and that the icon is considered to express an enormous central truth?

But today we have forgotten this issue. We have forgotten and ignore the value of the icon, and in practice we deny those things which theologically occupied much of the First Ecumenical Council, and also the Seventh Ecumenical Council. We have forgotten the subject that Jesus Christ is God and perfect man.2 That is, Jesus Christ is God and Man [Theanthropos], and since He is God and Man – perfect God and perfect Man – man, therefore, is able to be divinized. Today we have forgotten this. Today, we have left this behind, precisely because we do not know, we have forgotten, we are forgetful of the theology of the icon.

I will also note that we think of Christianity as nothing more than a set of ethical rules which will improve our lives. Moreover, we ignore the resurrection of the dead, because we forget about the “body”, and that “our soul will go to Paradise”, even God’s Kingdom, because the Kingdom of God is where our being is complete. In other words, it is not souls only in the Resurrected life, but the soul with the body. Jesus Christ ascended to heaven with His human nature. We ignore this. And you understand, that by ignoring our theosis, the theosis of our entire being, we are no longer ordering our lives properly.

So, why not eat, drink and be merry? “The body is worth nothing compared to the soul,” we say. “Why not fornicate, then, if the body plays no part at all?” Because the body is a temple of the Holy Spirit, it is a temple of the Holy Triune God. The body is to be considered. The body will rise high up, and this is always expressed, I repeat, with the icon, because the icon expresses the theanthropic3 nature of Christ, that God really become human, and, consequently, I also will become a god by the grace of God.


Characteristics of the Icon

We will now say a few words about some of the characteristics of an icon. These characteristics are inexhaustible, and the issue of icons will not be covered by the few things we will say.

The icon is a language, an artistic language, an aesthetic language, if you will, which expresses our Church’s dogmas, that is, they express the Church’s dogmas in an aesthetic, artistic manner. Therefore it is Orthodox theology in form and color. Every Orthodox icon has two dimensions: the timeless dimension (historical) and the present dimension.

An icon first brings us closer to the historical event. For example, the Baptism of Christ is a historical event, and it is well known that history, that is, the history of mankind, cannot be evaporated and disappear. History cannot become ideology. History is history, it is events, and history determines our salvation, because our salvation will happen in space and time. Let us not forget that the mystery of the divine Economy, of God becoming man, is an event, it is history.

Pay attention, I will say it a second and a third time. We cannot evaporate the events. We cannot idealize history. History is history. These are the events. So if we remove history, we basically have no icon, because the icon expresses a historical event. The icon will tell the story. It expresses the historical event.

After bringing us closer to the historical event, the icon wants to connect the believer of each era with the historical event it depicts. How is the believer connected? Is this connection a connection in the memory, like with a photo album, when we look an event from the past? Or it it, as we say, a sentimental approach? To look at an icon to remember something, to feel something. My beloved, it is no more than an approach to the original event in the past! It means that every believer of every era, of every moment in history, approaches this historic event. It is approached not sentimentally, nor in remembrance, but in reality.

When, for example, we say in our hymnology: “The Virgin on this day gives birth to Him who transcends essence”4 or “Today You are baptized in the Jordan, O Lord”5 or “Today is hung upon the Wood”6 this “today” is not literal. It is not, as we would say, the historical Present, but it is today because today I am approaching the event. The event is not far from me. The fact that I am separated by time does not matter. I am not far away. I approach the event and the event approaches me. Therefore, every moment connects me to the original event, and this is what the icon shows me, this is what the icon expresses to me.

But we also have the other dimension, the timeless, the dogmatic. Within the illustrated historical event, for example, as with the Lord’s Baptism, the dogmatic element is shown clearly. We see the Son baptized, the Holy Spirit present, the Father revealing His Son in the world, testifying: “This is My beloved Son.” (Mt. 3:17; Mk. 1:11; Lk. 3:22) What do we have here? In the historic sense, the historic event of the Baptism, that Christ went to the Jordan, we have a dogmatic truth, a timeless truth. Something which stands apart from the historical event.

And so we see that the icon not only retains its historicity, but also presents us something new, something deeper. It presents to us a transfigured world and shows us the Kingdom of God. The icon is a window through which we can see what is neither in space nor time, and at the same time it shows us space and time. The icon is within time and the icon is outside of time.

The faces of the saints, if you will, when they are depicted, are real, but they are not depicted with their natural characteristics. They are real faces, human faces, truly, but at the same time, they are timeless, transfigured faces. They already belong to the realm of the Kingdom of God. In the Kingdom of God we are complete. It will be as you see me and I see you, but at the same time we will be transfigured. In what way will we be transfigured? From corruption to incorruption, from death to immortality.

This is what one sees when he looks at a icon of a saint. He approaches something which is on the one hand in time and on the other hand timeless. He approaches the saint, but the saint no longer lives in this present life. Therefore the saint attracts him to live a transfigured life, for our existence to be transfigured, to change already in this present life, so that we are completely transfigured on the Day of the resurrection of the dead.

As you have noticed, the saints in Orthodox icons always look straight forward. At most, they only look at a three-quarter angle, very slight. Never do we see the back of a saint. We see the face. Why? Because this shows that the believer has a connection with the saint. The sojourner in this life has a connection with the saint whose story is told in the icon. This connection has great significance; it shows that the saint is not estranged from the believers. The saint is not estranged. In the Liturgy we mention the saints; we have their relics in the Holy altar table; we commemorate the saints at the prothesis where we put portions for ourselves. The Saints climbed higher than us, they left us but they remain bound to us. This is why we see the saints painted, narrated, before us.

Moreover, an icon, my beloved, can also become – pay attention – a portal of mercy. How can it become a portal of mercy? When I know that if a door opens, I will find mercy there, I will find my bread there, I will find Grace there, I will find help there, I will find healing there, I knock on that door. The icon is a portal of mercy. Do not forget this. It is the phenomenon of miracle-working icons. We go in front of an icon, we pray and we seek, and the saint depicted gives us that which we ask for. We say: “Panagia, save me”, and not abstractly, of course, wherever we can we pray, but for all good intentions and purposes, we have the icon of Panagia in front of us and we say, “Most-holy Mother of God, save us.” Or we go to the icon of St. Demetrios: “Saint Demetrios, save me.” What does this mean? Will the saint give us a helping hand? Yes! The icon, the painting, we say, the window, was up to that point closed. Then it opened, and the grace of the saint went out. How does this happen? Listen to how this happens.

st-iakovos-of-evia-blessing-with-relic
Saint Iakovos of Evia blessing with the miracle-working relic (skull) of Saint David of Evia.

It is a teaching of our Orthodox Church that when the saint lived in this life, he had the Spirit of God. When he died and left this world, he was not separated from the Spirit of God. He has this Spirit even now where his soul is in Paradise. He was divided. His soul went to Paradise, always united with the Spirit of God, and his body was placed in the grave, where the Spirit of God is united with his body. For the Lord said, We will come to dwell in the man who receives us. (Jn 14:23) Pay attention, He did not say, We will dwell in His soul, but in him, in his being. Not in his soul only, but in his body and soul together. With death, then, man’s body is not separated from the Holy Spirit. Thus we have what we call “holy relics” which work miracles. Why do they work miracles? Because they are united with the Spirit of God.

It is also known that whatever a holy person touches in this world, gives grace, conveys grace. In the Gospel according to St. Mark, this happened with Christ. Pay attention to what he says:

“And wherever He went, into villages, or cities, or the countryside, they laid the sick in the streets and begged Him that they might touch even the hem of His garment; and all those who touched Him were healed. (Mark 6: 56)

As it happened with Christ, my beloved, He now gives to the Apostles and Saints. Listen:

“…they brought out the sick into the streets and laid them on beds and mats, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might fall on some of them.” (Acts 5:15)

They were all healed. They took the handkerchiefs and aprons of the Apostle Paul, threw them on the patients and they recovered.7

Why? Because the objects that came in contact with their skin were sanctified. Thus, sanctified people, when their lives were hagiographed8, these icons are now miraculous. This is why, my beloved, icons work miracles.

Let us, however, emphasize something. Only Byzantine hagiography retains the prerequisites for dogmatic and moral teaching. Only the Byzantine icon. Western icons do not express anything. They express on the level of an event, and this, many times, is understood incorrectly [by the artist]. To make this clear, take, for example, Joseph with the Theotokos next to each other. They were not a couple. Why show them side by side and call it “The holy family”? They were not a couple. Byzantine hagiography shows the Panagia at the center of the icon and Christ next to her. Joseph? In a corner of the picture, down below, with his back turned, with his back facing the Virgin Mary and Jesus. What does this signify? That this Child is not his. You can see the difference. For this reason, I will tell you, my beloved, to always keep our homes, everywhere, worshipful places, everywhere, with Icons in the Byzantine style, which is dogma.

My beloved, we must not let it escape us that Christ is not only the Word of God, the Word of the Father, but is also an icon of the Father. Furthermore, we must not ignore the fact that man is an icon of Christ. Icons have a deep theology, as we have seen, and the more we study them, the more we find within their borders, without ever being able to exhaust what we find.

This entire world, this sensible world with its bright sunlight, is an icon of the future uncreated world. Moreover, inside the temple where we worship, the Liturgy is an icon of the heavenly Liturgy of the Saints, and communion with God. All the Christian symbols we have are icons of future good things. “They are a shadow of the the things to come,” says the the Apostle Paul to the Colossians (1:17). They are a shadow of the things to come.

This is why the Apostle writes:

“[The priests] who serve are a type and shadow of heavenly things; just as Moses was warned by God when he was about to make the tabernacle: ‘See,’ He said, ‘that you make all things according to the pattern showed to you on the mountain.’” (Heb. 8:5)

That is, how he was to make the Ark of the Covenant, and the other things. What did God give him there? Models. Patterns. Therefore, what were the tent, the temple, and the things constructed later? They were representations of the true, of the genuine, of the heavenly.

What am I saying? This life of ours, my beloved, is also an icon. “We walk by faith,” says the Apostle, “not by sight.” (2 Cor. 5:7) And what is faith? It is an icon. An icon. I do not see the reality, but I live through an intermediary, that is, through faith, not by sight. We do not have the reality. We have faith. We have the icon.

This is why our Church, my beloved, defeated the heretics and celebrates her victory today, which is Orthodoxy, with her projection of holy icons.

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis, March 22, 2023, from a homily recorded by Mr. Athanasios K. and transcribed by Ms. Eleni Linardaki. Text in Greek: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

Ordering our publications helps us to continue translating and publishing new material for you.
Have you read our book on the human nature of Christ: Jesus: Fallen? The Human Nature of Christ Examined from an Eastern Orthodox Perspective

  1. Deoctism, a heresy that Christ did not really suffer bodily
  2. Seventh Ecumenical Synod
  3. divine-human
  4. Kontakion of Christmas
  5. Apolytikion of Theophany
  6. Read at Great Friday Orthros and Royal Hours
  7. for those who do not know the famous account of the healing by St. Nektarios with the sweater …. THE FIRST MIRACLE ATTRIBUTED TO SAINT NEKTARIOS: During the last days of his life, Saint Nektarios was in the room for the incurables of the hospital, among many poor patients who were at the point of death. Beside the bed of Saint Nektarios was a patient who had been paralyzed for years. As soon as Nektarios gave up his spirit, a nurse of the hospital, together with a nun who had accompanied him, began to prepare his holy body for transportation to Aegina for burial. They removed an old sweater from him and placed it for convenience on the bed of the paralytic and continued to prepare the body. Suddenly, the paralytic became well and rose from his bed, praising the Lord. This was the first miracle after the repose of Saint Nektarios. (www.aeginagreece.com/aegina-island/greece/agios-nektarios-church-monastery)
  8. αγιο-γραφία – holy-writing/picture
Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE SELF-KNOWLEDGE OF THE PUBLICAN

self-knowledge of the tax-collector
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The Self-knowledge of the Publican” on February 12, 1995. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the quotations are not direct.

“The Self-knowledge of the Publican”

A homily by Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Sunday of The Publican and the Pharisee (Luke 18:10-14)

Before our eyes, once again, my beloved, is the precious parable of the Publican and the Pharisee. With this parable the Lord wishes to teach many lessons. He speaks to us about humility and pride, about “spiritual ethics”, if you will, sufficiency and insuffiency, about what makes a prayer good or bad, about the appearance of two types of people who go before the Lord, about the self-confidence of the one and the self-knowledge of the other. All this was spoken from the authentic mouth of our Lord Jesus Christ, so every point of the Lord’s teaching is an authentic answer.

The twist of the parable is known. Two men went up into the holy place, that is into the temple, in order to pray. One was a Pharisee, from the known order of the Pharisees, and the other a tax-collector, from among those who collected for the Romans, by way of auctions, in order to get the tribute.

The Pharisee, weighed down with self-confidence from his status, knowledge of the law and good deeds, stands and says his prayer to God with a great amount of self-confidence and arrogance. The tax-collector is also weighed down, however with crimes and various sins, and stands at one end to also say his prayer. His guilt, however, does not permit him to raise his head. The Evangelist Luke points out that He did not even wish to lift his eyes to heaven. He beats his breast constantly, is cut to the heart, grieving in his heart over the multitude of his many sins, and says continuously: “O God, be merciful to me, the sinner.”

We see, my beloved, in the behavior of the tax-collector a conspicuous self-knowledge, for he observed his condition and, as a result, asked mercy from the Lord. He was looking at himself. This is precisely what self-knowledge means: To be able to see yourself.

The Pharisee was not looking at himself, because his arrogance and his self-confidence were in the way, and thus, he was not able to see how he truly was. He thought that only the heavy hitting sins are those which defile a man. This is what the Pharisee believed. He was the type who says (and to this day, there is still the type who say): “I haven’t stolen anything. I haven’t killed anyone. I’m ok.” Whereas the tax-collector, he was looking at his true self.

We ask: What is self-knowledge? Self-knowledge is to be able to see the true condition of yourself. To have knowledge of yourself. Self-knowledge doesn’t deceive you like a delusion or arrogance or self-confidence, because at every moment this self-knowledge shows you the measure of your ability and the depth of your sinfulness. It asks you: Who are you? Self-knowledge, then, is the true knowledge of ourselves. It is the knowledge of the Ancient Greeks: “Know thyself.”

This knowledge of self is dynamic – not static – because at every moment I must know myself. Then, if I know myself, I will not think highly of myself. Instead, I will have in front of me the true, precise knowledge of myself, and this, of course, is humility automatically. I will have made, says St. Basil the Great, a return to my intrinsic worth, a return to my actual worth, that which I truly am.

Works by St. Peter Damascene and Blessed Nikitas Stithatos are found in the Philokalia.

Self knowledge is always bound with humility. It is not possible to have humility before, automatically. We have humility from a good objective: self-knowledge. Thus, when I have humility, I will also certainly have, inseparably, the help and grace of God, because “God gives His grace to the humble” (Jas 4:6). He gives His grace.

St. Peter Damascene says,

There is nothing better than to know one’s own sickness [weakness] and ignorance, nor anything worse than not recognizing them.1

Moreover, Blessed Nikitas Stithatos emphasizes,

Know yourself; this is indeed humility, the humility that teaches us to be inwardly humble and makes us contrite.2

The work which we have to complete on the earth is the spiritual work. God gave the first-formed couple three commands: the command of fasting (only from one tree, but to test them); the command of cultivating Paradise; and of preserving the hedge of Paradise (Gen. 2:15-17). But Paradise is within us, the kingdom of God is within us (Lk. 17:21). Adam, therefore, had to work and maintain the inner Paradise. Blessed Nikitas says that this is our task, to cultivate and to guard it:

You must cultivate and guard this humility, for if you do not yet know yourself, you cannot know what humility is and you have not yet embarked truly on the task of cultivating and guarding.”3

My beloved, of course we cultivate the earth, we do our biological work, but our primary work is this, the spiritual work. Why is spiritual work also called work? How is it possible to make myself better? Blessed Nikitas continues,

To know oneself is the goal of practicing the virtues.4

And Saint John of the Ladder tells us,

The one who knows himself never sets out to do something beyond himself.5

The one who has knowledge of himself, who knows who he is, also knows his abilities and his limitations. At no time will he be tricked into taking something up which is greater than his abilities. This one, my beloved, has strength in all things, in his spiritual condition, his profession, in anything whatsoever.

You cannot take up something if you do not have self-knowledge, since you may lack this or that. How will you take it up? The Lord tells us two parables about this: The parable of a king preparing to go to war (Lk. 14:31-33) and the parable about building a tower (Lk. 14:28-30).

Someone, it says, begins to build a tower that is very tall (and this is not about our spiritual building), but he does not sit down to figure out the cost, and once it reaches a certain height, the construction is abandoned. Then the passers-by mock, saying, “This man could not complete his construction.”

Is this not someone who is beginning the spiritual life? At some point, he sees that he cannot afford the roof, that is, to cover the spiritual restoration work and he stops the construction altogether. Do you know that we inhabit our buildings which have not been completed? I will put it in simple language: The crows nest there, that is, the passions of the soul return, and they encircle us in the world. Why? Because we do not estimate our abilities.

Did you begin? How will you figure out the cost? Did you start to be Christian? It is straightforward, but be careful. Have you considered whether you will endure the mockeries and persecutions, as we heard in today’s Epistle reading? It says, “Whoever wishes to live a godly life in Christ Jesus will be persecuted” (2 Tim. 3:12). Are you prepared? Are you perhaps someone who does not withstand temptations? Do you compromise with the world? Are you strong? If you have self-knowledge and humility you will know these things.

And how will we maintain true self-knowledge so that we are not tricked into thinking that we know ourselves when we do not? With a constant increase in humility; by becoming as humble as we can be so that our eyes open better; by taking a sincere look at ourselves, straight in the eyes.

If two men, who have no association with each other at all and who do not know each other, both tell me that I have the same shortcoming, then I register the thought, because if only one tells me, it is possible for me to dismiss it, but if both tell me, then I surely begin to ponder and say, “This is how it is”, even though I do not see it. I will begin to see it, and then I will discover it.

Moreover, at every moment, look within and examine yourself. Why? Because as I said, self-knowledge is dynamic. Must I examine how things are going with myself at every moment? The one who does so does well. Isn’t it good to ask forgiveness from God?

Saint Basil the Great suggests a certain technique, a method, that helps greatly in preventing repeated mistakes: When the day is over, make an examination of our past misdeeds, a cross-examination our consciences. How did we sin? How did I do today? How did things go? Did they go well? Did they not go well? 6

In our evening prayers, the Psalmist says, as he lays in bed (and we also in our own prayer): O Lord, today I struck You; I did this, this and this. Please forgive. And if it is something considerable, we make a note of it during our prayer to confess it. Are we doing well? We say “Glory be to God.” Are we not doing well? “Forgive us, O Lord.” Do this every evening. Then we can recognize ourselves at every hour and understand where we are.

The fruit of self-knowledge, my beloved, is the entire posture and movement of the tax-collector in his prayer. Did you see him? Did you observe? Did you also see the other? “Standing”, it says. He wore himself out offering prayers and said, “God, thank you.”7 Certainly, it is very important to say thank you to God and we must give thanks at every moment: “Glory be to God”, “Thank You, O Lord”; and every evening, “Thank you, O Lord”, but to say the thank you with arrogance, “that I am not like the others, the sinners”, this is something very terrible. He sees the tax-collector in the back. What was he doing there? Not only was he showing humility of soul, but also humility of body. How? With tears, with bows, with groans, with the downward inclination of his head. “He did not dare”, it says, “lift his eyes to heaven.” He looked to the ground.

Most significantly, the tax-collector in the parable grieved in his heart, and also had a prayer in his mouth and in his heart: “God, be merciful to me, the sinner.” That is, O Lord, be merciful, sympathetic, compassionate. Forgive me, the sinner. It means: If you exercise Your justice, O Lord, who can stand before You? The Psalmist says: Who is able to stand before God if God exercises His justice? No one. (Ps. 142:2)

Moreover, the fruit of self knowledge is that which we encounter frequently in the sayings of the Desert Fathers: “All will be saved but me.”

Moreover, it is that which St. Paul said: “I am the greatest of sinners” (1 Tim 1:16). As more time passed he descended the stairs. He says in his epistles, “I am the least of the Apostles” (1 Cor 15:9). Then later, as he had matured more, he writes, “I am the least of men” (Eph. 3:8). Finally, toward the end of his life he writes, “I am the greatest of sinners” (1 Tim. 1:15).

It is that which Saint Silouan the Athonite said: “Keep your mind in hell and despair not.” 8

Beloved, our Lord painted a colorful picture in the parable of the tax-collector and the Pharisee, in order to teach us self-knowledge and humility. We conclude with the same line of the parable: “All those who exalt themselves will be humbled, and all who humble themselves will be exalted.”

ΤΕΛΟΣ
ΚΑΙ ΤΩ ΘΕΩ ΔΟΞΑ

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis, February 27, 2024, to the best of his ability, from source audio Homily #629 on www.arnion.gr. Some sentences have been amended.

  1. Philokalia, Vol. 3, St. Peter Damascene, Book 1, Treasury of Divine Knowledge, “That We Should Not Despair Even If We Sin Many Times”.
  2. Philokalia, Vol. 4. On the Inner Nature of Things and on the Purification of the Intellect: One Hundred Texts, #35
  3. ibid.
  4. ibid.
  5. see The Ladder of Divine Ascent, Classics of Western Christianity Series
  6. Quote amended. See also Saint Basil and his rule, E.F. Morison, B.D., Oxford, London, 1912. pp. 64-65.
  7. This note is the author’s, which we made a footnote: “(God is used as the vocative case, O God; very many times we find the nominative case used as the vocative)”
  8. See St. Silouan the Athonite, [St.] Elder Sophrony, tr. Rosemary Edmonds.
Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

TODAY’S YOUTH AND ASPIRATIONS

Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “TODAY’S YOUTH AND ASPIRATIONS” on November 27, 1994 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was Abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

“TODAY’S YOUTH AND ASPIRATIONS” – a homily by Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Thirteenth Sunday of Luke (Luke 18:18-27), Homily Β308

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

The account of the rich young man, my beloved, who approached the Lord seeking what he must do to gain eternal life, is truly very moving for us. Although the question, what must I do to inherit eternal life? is an enormous topic, it seems that the Lord’s reply is very mundane. What did He tell him? “Keep the commandments.” Very simple. Keep the commandments. Perhaps the young man thought there was some great, extraordinary, unknown law, and for this reason asked: “Which ones?” (Mat 19:18) And the Lord listed for him the laws from the decalogue which were very familiar to everyone.

It is the same today, my beloved, they dismiss the Ten Commandments because they are very familiar. It is a peculiarity of man to disdain something he already knows. Always. Is it something said in a homily? the commandments? the Divine Liturgy? They feel a need to set aside what they learned, disdain it. Why? “Eh, we know these things; we’ve heard them a thousand times.” This is because the person does not always see the same thing as if it were the first time! This is an enormous subject.

This is not only the case with spiritual things, but also with our nature. We like to go all around, to the mountains, to the forest, to the sea, always. We also want to see new people. How many times do we get bored being with the same person every day, whether our spouse, children or friends. They get boring. We are always interested in something new.

Eh, we know these things.” We do not see with new eyes. We should sense that we are seeing something for the first time. Where is this ability found? Within us. Only within us. It is the same with the Ten Commandments. “Eh, I know them.” What did the young man say? “I have kept them from my youth.” Yes, he kept the commandments from the time he was a small child. However, had he truly been keeping the commandments all his life, there would have been no need for him to ask the Lord which commandments to keep, because he would have known that the commandments are the road, the way, the conduct whereby we reach eternal life.

Boredom of the commandments is the mistake of this young man, his failure. “The commandments?” “Yes, my good young man, there are things which never get old – the commandments of Christ. They are timeless. They are always the same, yet always new.” It is the same with the New Testament, reading about the person of Jesus Christ. “Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever” (Heb 13:8), the Apostle Paul says. The Ten Commandments must be lived, not just known.

Yet there is also something that surpasses the commandments, and this is what the young man was after. The Lord told him: “One thing you lack.” “What is it, Sir?” “Sell all that you have and distribute to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven, and come follow Me.Where does the emphasis fall in this sentence? Not on the wealth, not on “distribute to the poor”. Where, then, does the emphasis fall? on come follow Me”. The estate of the rich young man was, quite simply, an obstacle, therefore it was necessary for him to leave the heart of it, in order to follow Christ

What is this “come follow Me”? It is a dedication; something that goes beyond keeping the commandments. It is no longer “what will I keep”, but “who must I become.” I repeat. It is no longer “what will I keep.” If the commandments are kept, they are not kept for the sake of keeping them, as many as they may be, but for “Who have I become? How have I been formed by them? How have I been built up?” The young man, however, stopped at “what should I keep”. He could not get beyond himself and his money. The Lord told him to sell whatever he had for no other reason than to free him from the “what do I have to do” mentality and to advance to “who do I have to be”.

In any case, more than whether the rich young man misses the mark or not, what is of interest in this young man is his search for an aspiration. This is very significant. It is about eternal life. “What must I do to attain eternal life?” In the Evangelist Mark’s account of this dialogue, he informs us that the Lord showed the young man sympathy, “and Jesus looked at Him with love.” (Mk 10:21) Who did He have sympathy for? The one who had an aspiration, and certainly the greatest of aspirations, eternal life.

What are aspirations? They are worthy desires. They are what draw a man toward the higher things. They remove him from what is mundane in life and show him “the good life”, in the spiritual sense of the term. (When we say “the good life” it usually means one eats and drinks well, but the spiritual meaning is to become a very spiritual man, a very lofty man.) Aspirations are those worthwhile things innate in us all; they are according to our nature. To say, “our nature” means “I am a human being, whether I want to be or not; I cannot be something other than my nature.The worthy desires, the aspirations, then, are things in accordance with our nature that are transferred, passed on, in order to reach the point of resembling God. Aspirations, worthy desires, make a person be that which he must become. It is what Pindar said: Become who you are.” (Pythian 2, line 72) Be what you are by nature. In other words, become a person.

The aspirations, the worthy desires, are many: religion, country, family, education, relationships, virtues, work; all these things are worthy desires. The Apostle Paul writes something marvelous to the Philippians. He shows us these worthy desires and lists them: Finally, brethren, whatever is true, whatever is holy, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is pleasant, whatever is of good repute, if there is any virtue, if there is anything worthy of praise, consider these things and do the same.” (4:8-9) In the same epistle he writes: Our citizenship is in heaven.” (3:20) What does this mean? It means that the highest of aspirations is heaven, the highest of aspirations is the Kingdom of God, eternal life.

All of these worthy desires are attained either from revelation (whatever the word of God reveals to us) or from the natural innate ability. As human beings, we were made in the image of God, we have reason and we think; therefore we can be a perfect container for worthy desires and aspirations. What did the Ancient Greeks philosophize about? What did Pindar say? “Become who you are.” This is not from revelation, but from an innate ability.

We pose the question: Do young people today, like the young man we heard about in today’s gospel passage, have aspirations? What aspirations do they have? It well known that our times are characterized by cultural or spiritual decline. We are declining continually, and the result is a severely scarred society, decayed humanism. The scars are deep.

Other than the exceptions, of course, our youth today do not have aspirations. To be precise, their aspirations are faults, not worthy desires. They show their approval for things which, in other eras, people would feel shame. It is this which the Apostle Paul writes about to the Philippians: “whose God is their belly, who praise what they should be ashamed of, who think of earthly things.” (Phil 3:19) These are the aspirations of our youth today.

Furthermore, Saint Paul writes about the ancient world and its spirit, which our Christians today have surpassed. In his epistle to the Romans, he writes: “They have become vain in their thinking, their senseless heart has been darkened; claiming to be wise, they became fools. (Rom 1:21) Therefore God gave them up in the lusts of their hearts, to the uncleanness of dishonoring their bodies between them” (Rom 1:24) (he is speaking about homosexuality here). “So you want to be left to yourselves, wherever you end up.Just as they did not want to think about God, God gave them up to an unprincipled mind… (oh, this unprincipled mind, beloved, an unprincipled mind; an unprincipled, childish mind), …doing not what it should, but filling up with every unrighteousness, fornication, wickedness, greed, evil, envy, murder, quarreling, deceits, bad morals, gossip, backbiting, hatred of God, wantonness, pride, arrogance; they are inventors of evils, disobedient to parents, senseless, unfaithful, cold-hearted, stiff-necked, merciless.(Rom 1: 28-31)

The list is long. These are faults. Our youth people remain in these faults. Why? To honor their parents? “Honor your father and your mother” (Ex 20:12) is the Fifth Commandment, which we heard from the Lord today. Whose parents are honored today?

The aspirations of our young people today are always faults, a systematic, organized laziness, carelessness. Carelessness, laziness, is the sin of the second half of the twentieth-century. We see irresponsibility, unmerciful laziness, everywhere.

Go take look around the square at 10 in the morning in our city of Larisa. Whether it is winter or summer, young men and women go there to do what? They go there to sit… and sit… and sit. Don’t tell me, “they sit there because they are unemployed.” Don’t tell me this. They go there to sit. They sit longer than frogs. It appears that they exert the least possible amount of effort; whenever possible, they do less. At the same time they look for money. From where? From their parents, of course. They are thieves. Today this thievery happens on a grand scale. Why? In order to waste it on all kinds of pleasures: the cigarettes, the drugs, the hard liquor. They spend endless, wasted hours at the restaurants, the nightclubs, in front of the TV, at the dances and concerts, where they have demonic content; and they also have a demonic look: bedraggled, moronic, absent minded, with the boys deliberately tearing their jeans. Only serious boys and girls do not adopt this lifestyle, the earrings, the rings, the long hair, and intentional idleness – not unemployed – idleness, willful laziness. They don’t want to work. All of our young people today desire to acquire faults, to fill their souls with them. It is pitiful, very pitiful.

But how did our youths end up with these faults? How did this happen? There are many ways: The two world wars in our century, the confusion and realignment of foreign relations, the development of extreme individualism, are how we arrived at the borders of anarchy, like we know this anarchy and live in it today. God, religion, family and country are viewed as worthless; and where God is removed, then everything is allowedsays Dostoyevsky. It is true. If God is out of the picture, then I am allowed to do anything.

So we find ourselves in a climate of deep decline where the young people do not have aspirations anymore. Instead, they pursue faults. The family cannot help, because it too is, unfortunately, mixed up with rotten ideas (there are exceptions of course). Even good children from Christian families find themselves in this widespread bad climate which affects everyone, and they become corrupted also. The child will go down the street, into society; he will go to school and he will be suffer great harm.

Can we do anything about this? One time, beloved, the Lord said about a demon-possessed child: This kind of demon cannot be driven out except by prayer and fasting.(Mt 17:21, Mk 9:29) “Lord,” the disciples said, “why couldn’t we heal the child?This kind of demon cannot be driven out except by prayer and fasting. What does this mean? It means that people in our days are prey for the devil. Therefore, those who understand, those who are pained, those who still maintain within them their spiritual health, let them fast and pray, not neglecting Wednesdays and Fridays and the Lenten Fast. We also pray to the Lord to cast out the demons which are ravaging mankind, particularly our youth.

Furthermore, the Lord needs witnesses in everywhere, to speak to the young people, to wisen them, to enlighten them. The educational system we offer today is, of course, like one big paralytic (who will deny it?). The children cannot do a thing on their own. Perhaps we fear and disapprove of what they are taught. Those of you, however, who are teachers and who are listening to me, who have your spiritual health within, should present them an alternative. Tell the children, your elementary school students, your middle-school students, your high-school students, TELL THEM WHAT IS CORRECT. We will do whatever we can, nonetheless. We are beginning to see it, the value of boundaries, not to go beyond them…

Beloved, the young man of the Gospel is to be commended, of course, for seeking to attain eternal life. For certain, He did not attain it. He did not attain it because his heart was held captive by the passion of greed. Though he did have tenacity; he had tenacity. He saw things to aspire to and he desired them.

There are, of course, young people among us who have beautiful aspirations, with elevated thinking, with love for Christ. Glory be to God, they exist. We are to guard these young ones, protect them, praise them, and give them encouragement in these days which are so disappointing.

To conclude, we will do whatever we can, as each of us understands we can do, in order to save those who are left. So we will give our witness. Let them not pay attention to us at all. We will give our witness, nonetheless. There will always be people to find, there will be a remnant, there will be a people of God. There will be “the small flock”, as the Lord said. (Is 11:11) He will watch over it; they will benefit. Let God, beloved, let God be saddened over the new generation and let Him show them mercy.

ΤΕΛΟΣ
ΚΑΙ ΤΩ ΘΕΩ ΔΟΞΑ

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis, Nov. 26, 2023, from a homily transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.

Text source in Greek: Aktines, Nov. 26, 2022, Audio source: Arnion.gr
Image source

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE PARABLE OF THE RICH FOOL

https://tineye.com/search/34b0ece6d05acfe7a2df91338491f4c96b276902?sort=size&order=desc&page=1
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “AM I PERHAPS FOOLISH? – The parable of the Rich Fool” on November 22, 1998 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was Abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

AM I PERHAPS FOOLISH? – The parable of the Rich Fool – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Ninth Sunday of Luke (Luke 12:16-21), Homily Β387

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

It is a heavy thing for God to characterize you as foolish, my beloved. God praises a man when he is correct, as God wants him to be, but gives the heavy characterization when a man has left the road of doing His will. This He makes clear in the parable of the rich fool which we heard today, beloved, in our gospel passage.

In this parable, the Lord tells us that a certain man’s field had a bumper crop that year, and He indicates that this man was rich. The man was absorbed in thought. He was thinking where he would store his new crops. Do you see? Another care to think about. (You also see the poor having cares. Both the poor and the rich have cares. The one says: “How am I going to eat today?” The other says: “I have so many choices; what am I going to eat today?”) However, the rich man does not think to give away some of last year’s crop to the poor, but decides to gather together whatever he has and store it in new barns.

The characteristic of the rich man in the parable is dreadful self-love, love for himself. This is shown by his manner of speech throughout the parable, by the repetition of “my”. What does he say? “And I will gather up all my fruit and my grain, and I will say to my soul, ‘Soul, you have much good stored up for many years; relax, eat, drink and be merry’” (Luke 12:18). Do you see? “They are my goods. They are mine.” He did not consider how others were doing, only how I am doing, how I will live well. Not a single thought of giving to the poor, to his neighbor who might presently be in need.

The night on which he had these thoughts of greed, God appears to him in his sleep and says to him: “Fool, tonight your soul is demanded of you (By whom? The demons.); all that you have stored up, whose will they be?” The voice of God is fearful, my beloved. It is fearful also to be called “fool”. God called him “fool”… Can we truly comprehend God saying this to us? Can we comprehend what this means? What is a “fool”? He is the opposite of the prudent man. Foolishness is the opposite of prudence. He is someone without understanding, not prudent. He is foolish. [The word in Greek for foolish, άφρων (ahfron), is composed of the prefix ά- , which negates, and φρήν/φρενός “thinking”, hence “not thinking”, without prudence, foolish.]

It is known that there are four cardinal virtues for man; every other virtue arises from one of these four. (I have spoken many times about these four cardinal virtues in other homilies. It’s ok if we talk about them again, because a homily is not a flowery talk, but a lesson, a catechism; and school teachers say that repetition helps one remember something permanently.) So then, the four cardinal virtues are prudence, temperance [self-control], courage and justice. We also find these virtues mentioned in the Fourth book of Maccabees, verse 18: “There are four kinds of wisdom: prudence, justice, courage and temperance”. We must also say that these four cardinal virtues are found in the wise Ancient Greeks.

Prudence corresponds to thought, to the mind. Those who are prudent use their mind; temperance corresponds to feelings, the heart; courage corresponds to the will; and justice (also called discrimination), on the other side counterbalances the first three. When we say justice, we all think of a scale. The symbol of justice is the scale. It is these, I repeat, which are in equilibrium: prudence, temperance and courage. What does “counterbalance” mean? For one not to be very large and another very small, as with an right triangle, where one leg, prudence for example, is very long and another, courage, is very short. You may have a strong mind and understand many things, yet have no courage. So the virtue of justice counterbalances the other three other virtues, and balance is achieved. This is very very important.

And now we see how foolishness appears, which is what the passage we heard today is about. The delusion “happiness is found in abundance” is created. I am so happy! My crops produced abundantly! and I still have so much from last year, even from two years ago. And this year, my, what a good crop!So then, this delusion is created, a delusion, that happiness is found in abundance, because if I do not have money, I will die miserable’. (St. John Cassian the Roman mentioned that a certain monk acquired money and stashed it under a plank on the floor of his cell, for if I do not have money, I will die miserable.) It is an expression. “I will die miserable.” Pay attention, I will make a distinction (of course I do not say it to my children): “Children, look, this money I have is for my funeral”; or, “Put this shroud (which they buy from the Holy Land), on me for my burial”. We do not mean this. Far from it. They are in no way related.

Voluntary poverty, willing poverty, remedies this. And this voluntary poverty, the Fathers say, is first on the list of virtues. How did the Lord begin the Beatitudes? “Blessed are the poor in spirit” (Mt 5:3). What does this mean? The poor in spirit are those who are poor from choosing to be poor. They want to be poor. They are not fools. They are not stupid. They are not inept for getting rid of money. Why, then, do they wish to be poor? To attain a goal. That is to say, “because I want to work for the Kingdom of God.This is also why they do not marry. “I am not inept,,” some will say, “test me a little, to see if I am inept.

So then, blessed are the poor in spiritmeans those who are poor by a deliberate choice, so that “God’s Kingdom will belong to them” (Mt 5:3). If you were to open the collected works of St. Isaac the Syrian, you will see that the first of 80 or 90 homilies are about voluntary poverty. Why? Because it is the starting point of acquiring all the other virtues. Not that a rich man cannot be saved, of course. However the Lord did say that “it is difficult for a rich man to enter the Kingdom of God” (Mt 19:23), because they are deluded from their possessions, from their wealth.1 And then the disciples said: “Who, then, can be saved?” And the Lord said: “What is impossible for man is possible for God”. Yes, a rich man can be saved, the one who gives to the poor, the one who is charitable, whose wealth does not hinder him, whose heart is not attached to material things.

So then, the one who is greedy, the one who amasses, is proud deep down. He has arrogance, of body. The one who chooses not to fast has arrogance of body, not of spirit. Arrogance of body is to say: “I don’t fast because I want to keep my body healthy”. Whereas fasting humbles the body. That is, I humble my body by giving it ordinary food and moderate portions. Fasting, then, breaks the body’s arrogance. A man’s greediness prompted the Lord to speak the parable of the foolish rich man, in order for the greed to be made manifest. He had the dialogue beforehand, [“…speak to my brother, and tell him to divide the inheritance with me.” (v13)], and this offered the occasion for Him to relate the parable.

And He said: Be careful; guard yourself from every kind of greed; for a man’s life does not consist of his many possessions(Lk 12:15). It is the delusion I mentioned, that happiness is found in abundance, which motivates a man to be greedy. He is deluded. What is the right amount? The Apostle Paul tells us: “Reverence with contentment” (Heb 13:5, Phil 4:11, 1 Tim 6:8). That is, “be devout and content with what you have. Limit yourself.” The Apostle Paul says, “If we have food and shelter we have enough” (1 Tim 6:8) (shelter includes the clothes we wear and and our house, the roof over our head). We have food to eat. Glory be to God. We should not want to become one of the rich, because those who want to become rich, from all the deceptions that are required, fall into traps and desires, says the Apostle Paul (1 Tim 6:9)2; they pierce their heart [with many sorrows]. Indeed, the rich man has many cares, many more than the poor man, who is content with little and lives on a day’s wage, with almost no cares at all.

Concerning foolishness, I remind you of the saying, “he wasted the help of riches.”3Do other people exist?” Yes, my good man. “Are there also other people?” Do you understand what I am saying? “We have our heating, we have our food, we have our table, our clothes.” How many people are there right now in this cold weather who sleep by a river under a bridge! In Paris, the poor sleep under the bridge over the Seine. In London, the poor sleep under the bridge over the Thames. The poor sleep in half-completed buildings and are hungry. Is this not known to everyone? But concerning the poor we will say, “No one can get through to them, they are mentally ill, they don’t understand anything.” And prudence, this marvelous product of the mind, is completely absent, because we are foolish. So they cannot develop charity and a social conscience.

Moreover, in their foolishness the perception is born that “Everyone will die but me”. Mr so-and-so died. “Eh, he died. I didn’t die.” In this way the delusion is created, that “I am the only one who will not die”. Such a man, the fool, puts death out of mind; for him death doesn’t exist. The rich man in the parable did not figure that he might die one day. “Soul,” he said, “you have goods stored up for many years. Your life is in front of you.” And then the surprise came, “this very night your soul is required of you”. Frightening! The emphasis falls on “this very night”, that is, tonight you will die! It happens to all of us, my beloved, we think we will not die. Pay attention to this if you will… there is, of course, a hidden explanation here: God made man to live eternally, and this is the reason he believes he will not die. So we have here a case of I will not die so I can enjoy all of my goods. The mind says: “You will die. This is logical. Everyone dies.” The heart says: “No, you will not die.”

There is yet another delusion. In their foolishness, they cultivate the destructive perspective that there is no life after death. They say: “Who died and came back to tell us there is life after death?This perception is clearly the suicide of our existence. There is nothing after? You say nothing exists. Is this not suicide? That is, don’t you think you will end up in eternal punishment and in eternal hell? And yet there are many who wish to think: “There is no other life. Life is food and drink. There is nothing after this life”. This is utter materialism. (On the pedestal, my beloved, of the statue of Sennacherib, the last of the Assyrian kings, is inscribed the same law: “Life is to be passed with whatever food, whatever drink, whatever pleasure”, pleasure meaning erotic pleasure of the body. And it seems that Sennacherib was a very much homosexual. A king… and yet he was wearing women’s clothing in front of the people… A dreadful condition!) We hear this erroneous idea: “It is known that there is no other life”, repeated over and over by the press and by the mass media. “What is there beyond? Nothing. Where will we go? Will we go to the stars? We will go to the stars, I know this. After that, what will we do? Nothing.

The parable continues with the voice of God saying to the foolish rich man: That which you stored up, whose will it be?Hmm, indeed, the heir will arrive and say the old expression: “A problem, death is a unexpected problem” [literally, “bean by bean, then death comes”]. That is, a man saves “bean by bean” in order to become wealthy. “A problem, death is a problem… bean soup for the heir!” The heir takes the entire inheritance and eats it up! Indeed, you gather it up, O man, you gather it, but for whom? For your children? For your nephew or niece? For them to consume it all. You gather bean by bean and they will make bean soup, and eat it all at once. How foolish indeed the man is!

But when he feeds on the food of foolishness, of senselessness, then the monster is born, which is called atheism4. The Psalmist speaks about such a fool in Psalm 13: “The foolish man says in his heart, ‘There is no God’” (13:1). Who says God does not exist? The foolish man. The man with no sense. Yes. The wasting of the mind gives birth to atheism; because nature, which we all perceive, is like an open book, from which we learn Whose Creation it is. And you say, “God does not exist”? You say everything happened by chance? By chance? By chance? Is there any chance of this? And you say everything began by itself? By itself? A spontaneous beginning? That everything began by itself? You are foolish! Someone will say, “But I am a knowledgeable scientist.” You are foolish! You are a senseless man. The absence of prudence, then, leads also to atheism.

The atheist is senseless in every way to those around him. The atheist does not have “a sane mind”. I put “sane mind” in quotation marks, because they are not crazy for the nuthouse, but they are crazy nevertheless. Foolish. Senseless. Because atheism is irrational. Saint Basil the Great says: “God called him ‘fool’ because he was godless.”

And foolishness today, unfortunately, is very widespread. We must bring this out in the open, if we want to be candid. The Psalmist again says: The Lord looks down from heaven…(as if peeking out the window from a higher floor. It is a beautiful image) “…upon the sons of men to see if there are any who have any sense, who search diligently for God. They have all gone astray (they all took a wrong turn somewhere), they are altogether worthless [ἠχρειώθησαν], no one does what is good, not even one”, says King David in Psalm 13.

Beloved, the absence of prudence is greatly lamentable. God gave us the mind to always be oriented toward whatever is true, authentic and beneficial. He loves us, and cries out to us: “Accept correction, lest the Lord be angered and you perish from the way of the just,” He says in Psalm 2. What is this “Correction”? It is one of the many names of the second person of the Holy Trinity. Like the name “Wisdom [Sophia, Σοφία]. So then, He says to us: Seek Christ, lest the Lord be angered, because He is the One who gives us wisdom”. Indeed. In the book of Proverbs we read: The one lacking sense turns away from Me(Prov 1:32). The author of Proverbs speaks in the name of Enhypostatic Wisdom. “He who is senseless”, he says, “let him come close to me and acquire wisdom” (Prov 1:23).

What is wisdom? “Knowledge of the Maker,” says St. Peter the Damascene, “and not only to know the Maker, but also for your mind to be watchful. What must I do? What musn’t I do?And who gives us prudence? The Enhypostatic Wisdom of God. Then we have true wisdom, and not worldly wisdom like the rich man of the parable. Prudence, most importantly, is that which points to the Kingdom of God. Everything else is relative. Never let foolishness, my beloved, rule our heart. Amen.

ΤΕΛΟΣ
ΚΑΙ ΤΩ ΘΕΩ ΔΟΞΑ

  1. Saint John Chrysostom: “But having said it was difficult [for a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven, He proceeds to show that it is even impossible, and not merely impossible, but even in the highest degree impossible, by giving the comparison of the camel and the needle.” Homily 63 on Matthew, New Advent [edited]
  2. “But those who would be rich fall into temptations and snares, and into many senseless acts and desires, which drown men in destruction and perdition.”
  3. Tertullian: “The endowing of a man indeed with riches, is not an incongruity to God, for by the help of riches even rich men are comforted and assisted; moreover, by them many a work of justice and charity is carried out. But yet there are serious faults which accompany riches; and it is because of these that woes are denounced on the rich, even in the Gospel.” (Against Marcion, Book IV, Chp 15, New Advent)
  4. [αθεΐα, “a-theist” no-god, godless]

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis, Nov. 19, 2023, from a homily transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.
We reconstructed a few portions of the text in order for the ideas to make sense in English.

Text source in Greek: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE PARABLE OF THE GOOD SAMARITAN – THE CHURCH AS INN, INFIRMARY, ARK OF SALVATION

Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The parable of the Good Samaritan. The Church as Inn, Infirmary, Ark of salvation” on November 15, 1981 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was Abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

The parable of the Good Samaritan. The Church as Inn, Infirmary, Ark of salvation – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Eighth Sunday of Luke (Luke 10:25-37), Homily Β60

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

My beloved, if we only had the parable of the Good Samaritan, which we heard in today’s gospel passage, if only this parable were written down, together with the parable of the Prodigal Son, it would be enough to give us a marvelous outline of man’s fall, God’s love and the salvation of humanity. We see this in today’s parable, especially when it says, a certain man was going down from Jerusalem to Jericho. (Jerusalem stands for Paradise of old; and Jericho, the land of misery and apostasy. Falling into the hands of brigands is nothing but the fall of man into the hands of demons and the passions.) Furthermore, the priest and the Levite who approach, come and go, passing him right by, so the ritual law, the law of ethics and their way of life did not help them.

Then the Good Samaritan approaches. He stands for the incarnate Son of God and the compassion of God. He admits to the Inn the wounded man who had fallen into the hands of the brigands. The wounded man stands for humanity and the Inn stands for the Church, which is also an infirmary where one receives treatment and the Ark that saves.

All the emphasis of the parable falls on the person of the Samaritan and the Inn. I beg you to pay attention. The Inn is the Church. As you know, in the old days there was no such thing as a hotel, only the inn; the inn accepted everyone, whether well-dressed or poorly-dressed, rich or poor. If a beggar were to show up at a hotel today, not even a fancy one, he would not be permitted to stay if he is filthy and his clothing is tattered. The inn, however, accepted everyone, not only men and women, but animals as well, because they were travelers passing through, and they had their animals. The animals were led to the stables of the inn and they in the rooms. The inn [πανδοχείο], as its name implies [“παν” (anyone) + “δοχείο” (accepts)], accepted for anyone.

Have you ever really considered the Church to be an Inn that accepts anyone? Consider that it receives people in any condition, whether ragged, filthy or sick, no matter what. In other words, it accepts sinners, no matter what degree of sinner they are. The Church accepts everyone. Her objective is their sanctification, their perfection. As the Apostle Paul says, the Church has no other objective than the perfecting of God’s people (Eph 4:12), than to work out the commandment of God: “Become holy, for I am holy” (Lev 20:7). Whoever enters the Church, enters to become holy. Saint John Chrysostom offers the following very beautiful interpretation:

“Entering this refuge (Christ, that is) and finding humanity defiled, squalid, naked and bloodied, He bathes, anoints, nurtures and clothes it, He who became clothed in humanity receives him, and in this way He brings humanity back.”

Truly, one sees how much love God shows to “bring humanity back”, He picks it up and brings it to the Inn of the Church. The Church admits sinners and releases saints. In the early Church, something very moving was happening. Soon after entering the Church, former idolaters, those formerly unethical, and those who were formerly immoral became saints. Everyone entered from the main gate and went out from another gate of the Church to martyrdom! And they became martyrs! What a beautiful sight! Back then, everyone saw this happening frequently, but it has not happened like this for many years now, so we have only a small glimpse of how sinners were received into the Church and went out as saints and martyrs.

Actually, the Church receives the entire creation. As I said, the Church is an Inn. As an Inn, it does not accept people only, but material elements also. For example, when we celebrate a memorial, we have koliva, and when we celebrate an Artoklasia service, we have sweet bread. At times, we also put flowers in Church. All of these are material things. They represent the Creation. Whatever the Church receives, it sanctifies, in order that the entire creation may be sanctified, to unite everything with Christ, to make it into the Kingdom of God. Truly, the Church is an Inn.

But the Church is also an infirmary, because in this present world the faithful do nothing but battle constantly against the principalities and powers of darkness “in high places”, says the Apostle Paul (Eph 6:12). Consequently, the present life is nothing but an unending battlefield. Here battles are against wicked people and the wicked demons, but also against our former evil, corrupt and unjust self. Following every battle there are always injured, there are injuries and wounds. Those who are wounded in their battles, from their struggle and effort, arrive at the infirmary of the Church in order for them to be treated.

The Church is an infirmary. How beautiful! Consider how in the ancient world there were no hospitals. The inns took on the special function, as did the ancient Pagan temples, but had the essential features we know today, since there were no infirmaries. The Church emerged and stood out as the true infirmary both for souls, and no less, for bodies. Because when the Lord sends out His disciples, and through His disciples their successors, to heal all those who were sick among the people, this shows that the Church is nothing else but an infirmary, a clinic.

What medicines does she use? her wonderful medicines? They are the two denarii which the Good Samaritan gives to the innkeeper (who stands for the priest), saying: “Use these to heal my friend who is very sick, my greatly wounded friend (humanity)”. They are His word [λόγος] and the Sacraments. With these two denarii, the word of God and the Sacraments of the Church are are used by the Church, my beloved, to heal. Many times people say to me: “How can I get well? What must I do?” And I reply: “Come to Church and listen to the word of God”. I tell them this because I have seen it happen. It is a reality. Those who continuously and attentively listen to the word of God cultivate their soul, and their wounds, which they acquired because of their sins, heal. They stop sinning. These medicines, my beloved, are very very effective. The word of God and the Sacraments: Confession, Holy Communion, prayer… All of these are the means by which the Church treats her wounded faithful.

The Church is also an Ark of salvation. You remember the old story of Noah and his ark (Gen. 7:9). Whatever remained outside the ark was drowned. Whatever remained inside the ark was protected and saved. This is also how it is with the Ark of the Church, my beloved. (We know the ark of old was a prefigurement [τύπος] of the Church.) Whoever remains outside perishes. How do they perish? From the streams and flood of ideas and sights and obscenities and various sins. Every person perishes. It is impossible for anyone to be saved outside the Church. Only those who are in the Church are protected, these only are saved.

However, when we say “I am in the Church”, be careful here. We will remove a misunderstanding which people may have. When we say “I am in the Church” we do not mean I am in the temple. The temple is called “Church” by connotation, because the faithful are inside the temple. Therefore, to be in the Church does not mean that I am inside the temple, because I can be inside the temple, but not participate in God’s Sacraments, and if this is the case, then I am an outsider, I am estranged from the saving elements which Christ has given me. Someone will say “I am in the Church”, “I am a member”, as the Apostle Paul says “we are members of the Body of Christ” (1 Cor 12:27), but I am a member only when I am organically attached to the Body of Christ. This is what Church is.

The Church is the Body of Christ. Only when I commune of the Body and Blood of Christ and keep the commandments of God can I say that I am in the Church. Remember what the Lord says: “Whoever does not remain united with Me, as a branch to the vine, the trunk of the vine, and I am this trunk, does not bear fruit, but dries up and is gathered to be burned” (Jn. 15:6). This means that we must be belong organically, as a branch is connected to the trunk of the vine, and is given juice. So also must I be united with Christ, be a member of the Body of Christ, to have these juices of life, His Body and His Blood, flowing through me, which are, for me, life eternal. Only then can I say that I am in the Church, otherwise I am not. Do not be deceived.

If I try to fool myself, that I am a chanter or a council member or a groundskeeper of the Church, but do not receive Holy Communion, do not be deceived, I am outside the Church. Even if I am under the roof the Church, I am outside the Ark. I will be carried away by the flood and I will not be saved.

My beloved, I have been a priest for a number of years. Rarely, very rarely do I see chanters and council members receiving communion and going to confession. Why they do not, I do not know. It is not the time for me to tell you why, but I have learned this much and I have confirmed it: The chanters and the council members do not participate in the Sacraments of the Church.

At some point, at the Judgment, what the Lord told us will happen will happen with them: “Lord, didn’t You speak in our squares? Didn’t You come to our house to eat?” (Lk 13:26-27) In other words, the council members and the chanters and whoever else will say: “Lord, didn’t You come to us in the person of the priest and of the bishop to preach to us in the temple? Didn’t we take You home and offer You hospitality? Didn’t we set a fine table for You? How is it that You say You do not know us?” “I assure you,” the Lord says, “I do not know you, you workers of iniquity. Get out of here.” (Lk 13:27) Did you hear what the Lord said? It is frightful. Away with the deceptions, my beloved, away with the delusions. Only if I am repentant, only if I become a communicant of the Body and Blood of Christ, only if I am worthy as much as humanly possible, only if I keep the commandments of God, only then can I say that I am in the Church. Only then can I maintain the hope that I will be saved. Only then. But know this much, “outside the Church there is no salvation”, St. Cyprian of Carthage says clearly (Epistle 72, 21).

My beloved, we have seen that the Church is the great workshop of sanctification, the Inn which receives the rational and irrational creation to sanctify them, to make them incorruptible, to make them immortal, to lead them to the bliss of God. We have also seen that the Church is a marvelous infirmary and the true Ark which saves.

But let us close with these marvelous words of Holy Saint John Chrysostom: “Do not separate from the Church; there is no bastion other than the Church. Your hope? The Church. Your salvation? The Church. Your refuge? The Church.”

ΤΕΛΟΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΩ ΘΕΩ ΔΟΞΑ

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis, Nov. 11, 2023, from a homily transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.

Text source in Greek: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE RICH MAN AND LAZARUS PSYCHOANALYZED

https://tineye.com/search/3d4550a72d55f3d3ea98f8eb3f44106bcc1d08aa?sort=size&order=desc&page=1
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus: Two Psychological Studies” on November 4, 1995 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was the former abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

The Rich Man and Lazarus psychoanalyzed – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Fifth Sunday of Luke (Luke 16:19-31), Homily Β323

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

The parable of the rich man and Lazarus which we heard in today’s Gospel passage, my beloved, is a fictional story, which the Lord told as a reply to the Pharisees.

The Evengelist Luke notes: “Now the Pharisees, who were lovers of money, heard all these things; and they ridiculed Him.” (Lk. 16:14). (They ridiculed Him every time He spoke about voluntary poverty.) “And He said to them: ‘You are ones who justify yourselves before men, but God knows your hearts; for what is esteemed by men is an abomination before God. (Lk. 16:15) The Lord also told this parable to show them that they should not boast about their riches, their honor, their nobility, etc., because the scenery changes after death, the dwelling place changes. He also said that there are two dwelling places. One on Earth, this present life. The other in Heaven, after death. It is from here precisely that the Lord develops this parable.

As always, every word of the Lord is of great significance. With this parable, He does not want to teach just one thing, but also other things from other angles. The word of God is never exhausted. It is significant to note that, in every age, more and more is perceived in Holy Scripture, there is always something new to discover, an answer to offer us. Let us offer, then, a psychoanalysis of the two persons in the parable, beginning first with the rich man.

The Evangelist writes: “There was a man who was very rich, he wore fine linen dyed in purple and who feasted sumptuously every day. (19) (Purple was the color of kings in those days and was very expensive. The fine linen was an exclusive type of cotton from Egypt, certainly very expensive in those days also.) A rich man, like all rich men, this one included, lives well and is involved in politics. Exactly how this rich man acquired his wealth is not mentioned in the parable. Perhaps by fraud. Perhaps honorably. But this has no bearing here. His sin is not that he is rich, because God is also rich. And Abraham, who will enter as a third party in this parable, was not simply rich, but super rich. However, at no time in his life did Abraham ever make the acquisition of wealth the goal of his life, and because he did not make this the goal of his life, consequently, he was not attached to earthly wealth.

In his letter to the Hebrews, the Apostle tells us that Abraham “looked for a city that has foundations, whose architect and builder is God” (Heb 11:10). Which city is this, whose architect and builder is God? It is the Kingdom of God. That is, he lived on Earth but his mind was in Heaven. He accepted, received and awaited the Kingdom of God. We read elsewhere that he acquired no land at all, not even a piece the size of his foot (Acts 7:5). Why not? Because Abraham was always saying that he was a foreigner and a sojourner (Gen 23:4) – not in the land of Canaan, where God told him to settle permanently (Gen 17:8) – but in this present world. It is remarkable that we find Abraham in a parable where the Lord said he was in Paradise. This is what is remarkable: Truly, Abraham had gained Paradise.

We could say that He used the structure of the parable to open a dialogue between two wealthy men, Abraham and the rich man, who, after death, certainly did not go to Paradise, but to Hades. “A great chasm,” Abraham says, “has been established between you and us. We can neither go to you, neither can you come to us” (26). It is astounding. This dialogue between Abraham and the rich man in the parable shows that wealth is not something evil in and of itself, but rather, one’s attitude toward the wealth. Since the goal in life for a rich man is to acquire wealth, whatever wealth he may acquire, naturally, is for him to enjoy – all the good things in life.

First, he felt the need for a sense of security… As it is says in another parable, “I have much good stored up for many years” (Lk. 12:19). A rich man always has this feeling of security, because he has lots of money. Whether he is hungry or whatever else he might encounter, everything will go his way, because he has the money. (This is, of course, a delusion, because wealth comes and goes. Money is most unreliable. It changes hands with great ease; it leaves my pocket and goes into someone else’s.) This is how a rich man has a sense of security. He desires to be rich in order to feel secure.

He also wants to enjoy the comforts riches provide, to live “the good life”, to eat and drink well. Living this life, what does he say? “Everything is going well.” How does he feel? “Everything is for me.” Thus, little by little, an egocentric personality forms in a rich man, and the world must revolve around him. In the egocentric man there is no room for anyone else, not even God Himself. To the contrary, God must revolve around the him, to grant his every wish.

This is how a rich man seeks God: He makes his cross, he lights a candle, to assure himself that he is in God’s favor, for him not not to lose his possessions. You see, then, a person whose religiousness is self-seeking, whose religiousness is, in the eyes of God, of course rejected.

How does he think? Like one of the boys today who expect money from his father. I heard one boy say to another: “Look, your dad has to give you money for bringing you into this world!” It is the same with the foolish rich man. What does he say? “God is obligated to give me good things.” Moreover, he also becomes the hedonistic type. St. Theophylacht comments:

Not only was the rich man clothed in purple and fine linen, but he enjoyed every other delight; he feasted, not now and then, but every single day! And not in moderation, but sumptuously.”

St. Theophylacht renders “sumptuously” [λαμπρῶς] as “prodigal and extravagant”. And what is a hedonist essentially? A materialist; an idol worshiper. He worships what is material; he worships the flesh.

It follows that he is a heartless man. He does not take any interest in how someone else is doing. Really, how long was poor Lazarus outside the gate of his house? A very long time. He was not moved, even though he saw him every day from his window and from the balcony of his house, eating the crumbs his servants shook off his tablecloth. He was not moved.

A heartless man is also uncommunicative. He does not have relationships. He is self-centered. Many times, in order to reassure his conscience, he practices traces of religiousness.The rich man in the parable recognizes his ancestor Abraham from Hades and seeks his mercy, shouting, “Father Abraham, have mercy on me!” Of course, there is no way for him to be helped. He did, then, have natural love, but only for his brothers, his close relatives, by showing concern for them not to end up in that place of torment; there was love, but it was limited, only for his relatives. For poor Lazarus, whom he saw there every day on the other side of his gate, he showed no compassion at all, nor love. You see, then, that he did have a trace of humanity. Unfortunately, it was not able to save him.

His life was a portrait of arrogance. His presence certainly provoked the poor. He is an example of what is said in the Psalms, “It is the rich who make the poor burn” (Ps. 9:23). It is this fire of jealousy that makes the poor envy and wish evils for those who enjoy the good things wealth provides, while he himself has nothing to eat. “They burn the poor”, it says.

And what is especially noteworthy in this story is this: The rich man has no name. What does it say? The learned Holy Chrysostom comments:

“And where do we find the name of the rich man? Nowhere. He is nameless. How rich he was! yet his name is nowhere to be found…”

Another interpreter, St. Theophylacht, says,

“The man was unworthy of being given a name by God.”

And something more from a third interpreter:

“It is written about evil-doers: ‘…do not let their names pass through my lips when I remember them.’” (Ps. 15:4b)

God knows all things, yet this is what He says: “I do not wish to remember” (of course God cannot forget; it is an expression). We also use this expression: “I don’t ever want to hear his name again!” And we say with contempt another expression: “I don’t want to have anything to do with him”. This is what God is saying: “I do not want to remember the name of this sinner, nor will I even mention his name with my lips”. So then, the rich man in the parable is nameless. That is, he had no personhood, for a name is what makes a person.

And now we come to the personality of the poor man Lazarus. The parable provides a sufficient description of him. He was poor. Whether he was born into poverty or not, we do not know. In any case, he was not poor from prodigal living, because there is a certain reverence in his character. (It happens many times that the poor are isolated from society because of their poverty, without them being responsible, of course, for their poverty.)

What makes this poor man a person is that he was given a name. He was called Lazarus. And the name “Lazarus” has a meaning: “God is my help” (Ps. 17:3, Ps. 61:8). Someone may ask: Since God was his help, why didn’t He deliver him out of poverty? Why didn’t He heal his sores, which it says “he was covered with”? Why not? I have said it before and I will say it again: We must change our understanding about what divine help is.

Divine help does not mean for God to take away my poverty, to take away my sickness, or to change my adverse situations. God’s help is, rather, to help me endure all these things, that I might see the face of God. This is what it means to be helped, to be saved. St. Theophylacht also comments: “The poor man’s name is remembered”. And do you know that it is the only name given in all the parables? It is a unique case.

Allow me to open a brief parenthesis, because a parable has many interpretations. You know that another Lazarus, the brother of Mary and Martha, was risen from the dead after being dead for four days. Not only did the Jews not believe, they even called a council together to prevent the miracle of Jesus Christ from being made known, because, it says, all of Judea went to Bethany to see Lazarus who had been resurrected (Jn 12:9). And the wretched ones plotted to murder Lazarus also. (Jn. 12:10) Did they believe? No. This is why the Lord gave the name in this parable, as if He wanted to say to the Jews: “Lazarus was resurrected, and you did not believe.

The parable continues and builds up another aspect. Abraham says to him, “My child, if they do not accept Moses and the Law and the Prophets, they are not going to believe, even if someone resurrected from the dead goes to warn them.”

Lazarus was resurrected. The Lord worked this miracle for them. They saw the resurrected man. Did they believe? Perhaps they might have said,“Do it again, in front of us this time,” as they premeditated His murder.

Christ gave them a reply. He used a parable which consisted of a poor man at the gate of a rich man’s house, and composed an animated dialogue with the rich landowner. Beside sitting there, the poor man offered no other testimony. He did not protest for equality. He did not insult the rich man. He did not seek to enjoy the kind of life inside his mansion. Not once did he ever lift his fist (the contemporary symbol of social equality). He never had enough food; all he ate was the rich man’s table scraps, which he picked out of the trash. What does this show? He had great humility. And not only was he poor, but sick as well, covered with sores. His condition is why he was isolated by society. They despised him. He was covered with open sores. The stray dogs were his companions. Only the dogs showed a friendly disposition toward him.

It appears that poverty puts one closer to the Creator. It shows us a way to live that is in accord with man’s nature. A child who is poor gets dirty playing outside. This is closer to his nature than whatever games a rich kid may play. Wealth, if you think about it, pushes a human being away from natural human behavior. Poverty brings a man closer to what is natural. His food is also more natural, and his behavior is more natural. Wealth creates an artificial world, a phony world.

In poor Lazarus, however, we find a desirable virtue, holy silence! In holy silence, which has much to say, we discover the mystery of the human person. We see the Lord also keeping silent. “Do you not answer me?”, Pilate said to Him. “But He was silent” (Mk. 14:61), precisely because he had much to say. The one who is silent has much to say.

Finally, the presence of the poor man sitting across from the rich man was a challenge to wealth, a challenge which should have left an impression on the rich man, making him feel ashamed; he should have covered his face before Lazarus’ poverty. When shame is absent, the challenge appears.

Today, beloved, with this parable of the rich man and Lazarus, the Lord shows us two personalities, concerning two stations in life, two different attitudes toward God and fellow human beings. Having these in front of us, we should reflect on ourselves. As we said, neither wealth nor poverty are good in and of themselves. They simply offer two opportunities for a man to improve his character.

Being poor and being wealthy are two different stations in life that create their own dynamic, we could say, whereby a human being can show concern and genuine human love for others. The difference in stations is not to blame, but social confinement, which breeds hostile relations, murder, hate and war. The parable of the rich man and Lazarus is, my beloved, a thumbnail sketch of two personalities; we must study them and learn how we must behave before God and man.

Translated by Anthony Hatzidakis and Fr.E.H., Nov. 6, 2023, from a homily transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.

Text in Greek: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE PHENOMENON OF DEMONIC POSSESSION

https://tineye.com/search/5fef12b21ac744804b0ce5005359256afd361ef8?sort=size&order=desc&page=1
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The phenomenon of demonic possession” on October 20, 1996 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was the former abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

The phenomenon of demonic possession – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Sixth Sunday of Luke (Luke 8:26-39), Homily Β346
The demon-possessed man (Luke 8: 5-15)

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

We are filled with fear, my beloved, every time we hear a gospel passage that refers to demons and the victims of demons, those who are demon-possessed.

The Lord passed by the eastern shore of Lake Gennesaret, precisely to meet this man, described in today’s gospel passage as “demon-possessed”. And He freed him. The evangelist John writes: “For this purpose the Son of God was manifested, that he might destroy the works of the devil. (1 John 3:8)  The work of the devil is to possess both created things and man, and to prevent God’s intervention. An irrational creation that is demonically possessed always destroys itself. Case in point, the demonic possession of the two thousand pigs that choked to death in the lake.

There are various kinds of demonic possession of a man, such as the possessed man in today’s Gospel passage who lived alone outside in the countryside like an animal, to the demon possessed Gerasenes who did not want the Lord to visit them, to the demon possessed swineherds who practiced a profession not permitted by God.

Anything that takes us away or keeps us away from Christ is demonically possessed. Everything that is not close to Christ. The Lord said: “He who is not with Me is against Me.” (Lk 11:23) There is no third category. Either you are with Christ or you are not. Everything that opposes Christ is also demonically possessed.

Man, beloved, is created in the image of Christ and has no reason to be far from Christ. We assumed His form, based on the form that He would become, embrace and clothe His creation with. He took the form that He had earlier given to us. … That is, He did not become what Adam was, but Adam became what Christ was, what the Logos of God was when he became human. Therefore, man’s estrangement from Christ is an unnatural condition, it is demonic. Since we have this relation to Christ, but do not approach our relative, our behavior is unnatural.

Once the first-formed man and woman put their faith in the devil, they turned away from God. In other words, they believed the deceptive words of the devil and did not believe what God said: “You are not to eat from this tree. If you eat its fruit, you will surely die” (Gen 2:17). Of course their death was primarily spiritual, and much later, physical. From the time they believed the devil, they became his property. That is why “the whole world”, as the evangelist John tells us, “lies on the ground in wickedness” (1 Jn 5:19). The mentality of the world, its way of life, is in the hands of the devil. Frightful! Now, in order for man to be freed from the devil, he must return and believe in the divine-human person of Christ. This is how it has always happened and how it must always happen.

The purest expression of demonic possession is idolatry, i.e. the worship of creation, in which the devil hides behind. Let us not forget that idolatry is making a comeback. Can you believe it? The Logos of God tells us this will happen in the book of Revelation.

The angel who guides, so they told John the Evangelist in the mysteries of the future and the present, who sees a beast, the dragon, and the angel says to him: “Why do you marvel? … The beast which you saw, was, and is not, and shall come up out of the bottomless pit and go into destruction.” (Rev 17:7-8). The beast is the idolatry that prevails, it is an expression, as I told you before, of the dominion of Satan.

When Christ came and walked among us, people began to believe in the Christ. Therefore the beast of idolatry was no more. But the beast will return, but he won’t last for long. He will go to perdition, to the abyss, that is, when idolatry returns – did you catch what I said? – idolatry will return, and when it returns, the end of time is not far away. Therefore the return of idolatry is a sign that the end of time is near.

Demonic possession refers to the whole person, but sometimes only in the body, as shown with Job who was wounded physically. They dominated Job’s body.  When the devil asked the Lord if he could tempt Job, He said to him: “He is in your hand. Just spare his life” (Job 2:5-6). Sometimes demonic possession is only in the soul, like the Gerasenes who did not accept Christ. “Please, leave!” (Luke 8:37) For he had gone to their city to preach. They were frightened. And the Lord entered the boat and left.  Yes, demonic possession exists. Demonic possession in the soul.

Unbelief, or atheism, may not sound like something crazy is being done, but it is the height of demonic possession. It gives birth to the demonic possession of the soul. And these are not small matters, of course. Demonic possession of the soul is demonic rule over the powers of the soul. What are the “powers of the soul?” Mind, feeling, will, and these constitute the personality of man, his self-awareness, what we call “I”. These powers are how I know that I am myself and not someone else, my person, the self, my personal me. Demonic possession goes so far as covering up the human “I”. It is, in other words, a cover-up, so to speak, of the personality. What did the possessed man say when he was asked by the Lord “What is your name?” He did not say, “My name is so-and-so.” But he said, “Legion.” Why? The demons were speaking… My beloved, it is a fearful thing. Let me put it another way: Man “loses” his personality. Why do I put this in quotation marks? Because when the Lord healed the possessed man, the man found himself again, he found his self, he found his personality. So mind, will and feeling are fettered by the devil.

Finally, sometimes demonic possession refers to the body and the soul. That is, the whole person.

But what demonizes a man? Unbelief and all sin. These two things. Idolatry, to be precise, if you were indeed baptized. Please pay attention to the Baptismal service and see how the Church casts out demons.  The priest says: “Depart”, with the Catechumen facing west, “and never enter God’s creature again.”

Then there are the so-called “Eastern religions” which are expressions of idolatry. Buddhism, Hinduism, etc… all of them. They use magic. Magic is a central element of paganism, with psychics and mediums.

And there is also demonic music, music that only serves to divert the attention of our young people away from God, for them to be entertained.

Then there is blasphemy. Blasphemy in a broad sense is demonic possession. There is the usual blasphemy of God, that which we hear with our ears in the streets, and there is also heresy, which is also a form of blasphemy, the blaspheming of God by saying that Jesus Christ is not consubstantial with the Father, or that the Holy Spirit is an energy of God and is not a person. When the heretics, chiliasts and other heretics say these things, they blaspheme. The sins of the flesh are also blasphemy, because the human body is the temple of the Holy Spirit. In general, every sin that persists, which is not eradicated with repentance is blasphemy.

Finally, it  is blasphemy when one receives Holy Communion having grave sins or when one disbelieves the reality of the Holy Eucharist.

When we go to receive, we renew our confession of faith at the last minute. We say, “I believe that this is truly Your most pure Body and that this is truly Your precious Blood.” Of course, our senses do not tell us this, because it is a mystery. We sense wine and bread. In reality, however, it is the Body and Blood of Christ. This is why the Apostle Paul says, What forgiveness will a man receive, if he receives the Body and Blood of Christ unworthily, when he considers it not to be the Body and Blood of Christ? (1 Cor 11:27) It is with this confession of faith that he receives forgiveness. So there is no forgiveness for the man who does not believe. There are chilling examples of this from the Church Fathers but in modern times as well. Someone will receive Holy Communion, step back two meters, fall to the ground, foam at the mouth, and get beaten up. Why? Because he was possessed, my beloved, because he communed without believing.

And what are the symptoms of demonic possession? Today’s Gospel passage tells us that this demon-possessed man was not wearing any clothes. He had taken them off. In our modern society today, nudism is in fashion, in every season. Don’t they stop to consider that they become a scandal to the children of God, to the people of God? The women just don’t put a brake on this trend. This is demonic possession. The man in the gospel passage, it says, did not dress.

Because God made, it says, leathern tunics and clothed the first-formed man and woman. Why? Because their simplicity [child-like-ness] was destroyed. So there is always a need for clothing. If we wear no clothing, we take off the garment of God gave us, and we scandalize other people.

For example, in His letter to the bishop of Pergamum, the Lord says: “I have something against you, because you hold there the teaching of Balaam, who taught Balak to cause scandal before the children of Israel and eat idolatrous things and commit fornication.” (Rev 2:12-17) So here we have those who keep the teaching of the Nicolaitans in the same way. (Rev 2:6). Balak was a king of the Moabites. He saw the Jews approaching from the desert, two-million of them. He says, “What am I going to do; They will devour my city. They will lick me like a cow licks grass” (Num 22:4). And the King called for a magician from Persia (the king’s name was Balaam), and he says to him: “I want you to curse them for me!” but he didn’t catch anything; this happened three times), so He said to him: “I will tell you what to do: Make ceremonies (they were the ceremonies of Beelthegor) and invite the Jews to the feasts” (so they would sacrifice to the idols and then, as the pagan festivals usually were, they would indulge in feasts and fornication). “And then God,” he says, “will turn away from them,” and Balak did this, and twenty-three thousand men were slain that day! It is a frightful story. It is in the book “Numbers” in the Old Testament (Num 22).

What did he say? “In order to succeed, for God to punish them.” Here too, he also says, “You have the Nicolaitans, who show their nakedness and their fornications” (Nicolaitanism was eroticism. Eroticism today? Rampant in the streets, rambunctious! You see? Scandal!)

Furthermore, this possessed man did not live in a house. Demonic possession is also, to give an example, when people, even young men and women, leave their houses in the morning to go to Larissa square to watch the pedestrians walk by on a nice day. If it’s not a nice day, they sit inside, along the street, both young men and women, idle, not doing any work.

Hey girl, don’t you have any work at home? So why did you go out this morning? You, my dear, don’t you have anything to do?

And you see them cross-legged, sipping their little coffee, puffing their little cigarette, etc. The pedestrian streets of Larissa are full. What does this show? People don’t stay at home to make a little progress in life, but go out (and I don’t mean on an errand, for something legitimate). This is happening every day.

And what else does it say? That this possessed man lived in the tombs. He did not live at home. At that time the graves were little caves on the hillsides, etc. The youth of today are graves of sin; places of spiritual necrosis. They frequent all the various dens of sin. Cafes, nightclubs, etc. characterized by the Holy Bible, my beloved, as “places of death and treasuries of hell”. This is where they go…

So we have demonic possession in this wider sense, in every age and especially in our age. Beloved, the phenomenon of demonic possession is terrible. Beholding the possessed man in today’s Gospel passage should be enough to convince us. Go and re-read the passage. See what a miserable man he was. Yes, today people exhibit demonic behaviors, especially many of our young people.

We have said that two things demonize a man. Unbelief and sin. Let us be careful. Let us hold the gates of the soul closed to passions and alienation from God. Our Lord Jesus Christ came into the world to destroy the works of the devil. It is enough to belong exclusively to our Lord Jesus Christ. Amen.

Translation, editing and emphases by Anthony Hatzidakis from a transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.

Greek text source: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE USEFULNESS OF THE PARABLE AND ITS VALUE

https://tineye.com/search/7fe327ef457b5cf5e291e49f90c71a7d80c78181?sort=size&order=desc&page=1
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered this homily “The usefulness of the parable and its value” on October 11, 1998 at the Holy Monastery Komneniou in Larisa, Greece, where he was the former abbot. The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

The usefulness of the parable and its value – Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Fourth Sunday of Luke and of the Fathers of the Seventh Ecumenical Council, Homily Β384

The Parable of the Sower (Luke 8: 5-15)

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

Today, my beloved, we heard the Parable of the Sower, which The Lord told in order to show to His listeners that not all were equally disposed toward His teachings. Through this parable, He shows that there were four categories of listeners.

There are those whose hearts were completely hardened towards the word of God; those whose hearts were shallow (about whom He says, “the seed fell upon the rock, and because it did not have moisture, it sprouted, but withered”); those on whom the seed fell on thorns (that is, those who, because of the cares of life, did not bother to develop the spiritual life.); but there is also “good soil”, the good heart, “on which,” He says, “the seed fell and produced a hundredfold.”

The Lord sees that a large crowd is gathering. Luke says: “And when a large crowd had gathered, having gone out from the city to Him, He spoke using a parable” (8:4). People, many people, a stream of people! But why did the Lord speak with a parable?

What is a Parable

It was the Lord’s custom to discourse using a parable. The parable is a short fictional story, however it contains believable events, which have different and varied goals. Take Aesop’s fables. One of them says that a crow was holding a bit of cheese in its beak, and the fox down below said to it, “O what a charming creature is the bird that sings…” This is not something believable, because foxes do not speak and neither do crows. Therefore they are fables, parables without real events. Although all the parables of Christ, as a rule, are fictional, they are believable stories. They have the force of reality.

The parable consists of a hidden divine contemplation which clarifies one’s thinking. Pay attention to this. Mark says: He did not speak to them without a parable (Mk. 4:34). The Lord conveyed a thought when He said: “Be on guard against every kind of greed” (Lk. 12:15), but He made clear, by way of a parable, the danger which exists there, greed, by relating the parable of the foolish rich man (Lk. 12:16-20).

In order to put the event of salvation into proportion, how many men are sinful and how many are acceptable before God, He related three parables: The parable of the lost drachma (Lk. 15:8-10), of the missing sheep (Lk. 15:4-7) and of the prodigal son (Lk 15:11-32). You see, the Lord makes a statement regarding behavior or faith and follows it up with a parable. Why? In order to make clear what He said.

The parable expresses the wealth of a thought which you can view from all angles. This is the advantage a parable has. Although you cannot say anything more within the constraints of the parable, you can, nevertheless, say very many things about it and draw many conclusions about reality when a parable is told. We will say, “The parable also means this, it also means that, and this too.”

The parable, moreover, my beloved, is a well-knit teaching, a single teaching with few words. With a single image, the entire teaching is encapsulated. There is a saying going around in our days, “a picture says a thousand words.” Take a picture of an event and publish it, a picture of some event that you cannot say a thousand words about, and it can be made into a lead story. It is the same with the parable. The parable is an image which contains it all, a way to see something all at once. (That fable which you say is something different, it is nonsensical.)

The parable, moreover, is a memorable teaching because it is dressed up with imagery, and when a teaching is dressed up with imagery, with some presentation, a man remembers it much better.

It is at the same time both a parable and a mine from which one can, in the future, however much he may change, broaden his knowledge from what is contained within it; from which he can draw out more and more, an inexhaustible amount of conclusions. Whatever may happen to a man, he can always turn to the parable to discover what it conceals and say, “Look, the parable means this.

With the parable, what is inexpressible is expressed. A parable, then, is this: an image of a divine reality clothed in earthly garments. When the Lord wished to speak about the Kingdom of God, He said, “To what can I compare the Kingdom of Heaven?” (Lk. 13:18) He found a way, but with difficulty. What can I compare it to? He told three parables, not one, but three, and with each parable He could develop an aspect of the Kingdom of Heaven.2 The languages which we have created are poor and inadequate. We see this in everyday life. How many times have we found it difficult to switch from one language to another, to translate something, some sense of a word, some concepts. We do not find it easy. How much more when we express things which are inexpressible. Human language, then, is very very poor.

The parable, moreover, differentiates the listeners. “The value of the parable and its worth is obvious,” says the holy Chrysostom, “It makes a distinction between the one who is worthy and the one who is not worthy.”3 This is also the case here in the present parable of the Sower. There were those who went out to hear the Lord, but with what disposition? Out of curiosity? (We encounter this in other cases related by the holy Evangelists.) From mischievousness, like the Pharisees? For some superficial reason? Or from genuine desire? You can see here that the parable makes a distinction between the listeners.

The parable, moreover (and this is important), reveals and conceals, it makes clear and it darkens. It does both. The two are yoked. I repeat, it reveals and conceals. The parable is like the light [of God] the Hebrews had in Egypt. For them it was like a sunny day, but at the same time there in Egypt (this was the land of Goshen, a little southeast) the Egyptians were living in deep darkness. The holy historian tells us that the darkness “was felt” (Ex. 10:21).4 That is, they had to feel around in order to grasp something, whereas the Hebrews had dazzling light! This is what the parable is like. Some see and others do not see. The parable may clarify entirely for some and leave others in the dark. Listen to what Matthew writes:

“The disciples approached Him and said, ‘Why do You speak to them in parables?’ He replied, ‘To you it has been given to know the mysteries of the Kingdom of Heaven, but to these it has not been given.’” (Lk. 8:10, Mt. 13:11)

“For whoever has, more will be given to him; but whoever does not have, even what he has will be taken away” (Lk. 19:26, Mt. 25:29). That is, if you have a little of the Spirit of God, if your eyes are well-disposed to it, then you will be able to distinguish very many conclusions. On the other hand, if you really have something, but do not have faith within and cannot discern that which you have, God will take this from you. Does this not make an impression?

Why did the Lord speak in parables?

This is why I speak to them in parables, that seeing they may not see and hearing they may not understand” (Is. 6:9, Mt. 13:15). You will say to me: “Are you saying that the Lord does not want all to understand?” That is not what we are saying, my beloved, because understanding depends on your disposition when approaching the word of God. The word of God is sealed with seven seals. There are seven seals if one does not have a good disposition. This is why many who do not have the Spirit of God read Holy Scripture and call it nonsense. Do you want to know something more? They also scorn the teachings and blaspheme them. This is because they do not have the Spirit of God. They see but do not see, they hear, but do not hear. He says: “Here is the meaning. You still do not hear? Even now you don’t get the message?” and says to them, “You are blind” (Is. 42:18; Mt. 23:16,17,19,24,26). “Blind?” they say, “We see and hear you!”No,” He says, “if you were seeing, you would be standing in front of me differently.” (Jn. 9:40-41)

“Blessed are your eyes that see and ears that hear” (Lk. 10:23). Which eyes? The eyes of the soul. Which ears? The ears of the soul. You are blessed. You see here, then, a differentiation is made. Some like this, some like that.

You will say to me, “Why is it this way?” My beloved, because of God’s love for man, so that the scoffers will not to be punished more severely. Do you know what He will say to the scoffer? Something dreadful! You see, but you disregard it, you do not respect it, but turn your back on it. Saint Theophylacht says,

“Christ conceals these things from them so that they will not be judged more severely, as ones who know the mysteries and scorn them; it is for their sake that Christ conceals these things from them, for upon knowing and then scorning, they deserve grave punishments.”

Beloved, the key to interpreting and comprehending all of Holy Scripture, both the natural events and the parables, is obvious. It is Christ. Do you believe in Christ? You will find in Holy Scripture an astonishing revelation; both the Old and New Testament will speak to you continually about Christ. However, if you do not believe, you will not profit, you will understand nothing.

The flesh of Christ, the human nature of the Logos of God, is like the parable. You see [the man], but you do not see [the divinity]. Some of those listening to Christ say: “What is that man saying?” They understand nothing.

What did the disciples say? Explain to us what You said (Luke 8:9). The holy Chrysostom says: “The Holy Spirit is the Maker of other eyes.” Do you have the Holy Spirit? Then you see what others do not see, those who do not have the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit changes our eyes. He creates new eyes for us, spiritual eyes. And so, my beloved, we also must have the Holy Spirit to live, for our eyes to open.

Can I tell what kind of listener of the word I am? Hardened? Obstinate? Superficial? Shallow? Or good soil? You can make a self-examination using today’s parable. To tremble. To be corrected. To be saved. Amen.

  1. The mustard seed (Lk. 13:19, cf. Mt. 13:31, Mk. 4:31), leaven (Lk. 13:21; cf. Mt. 13:33), narrow door (Lk. 13:22). [Three additional parables about the Kingdom of Heaven are related by the Evengelist Matthew: The hidden treasure in the field (Mt. 13:44); the pearl of great price (Mt. 13:45); the net (Mt. 13:47)
  2. Explanation of the Psalms. Psalm 48, #3, PG 47-64
  3. “And the Lord said to Moses, ‘Stretch out your hand to heaven, and let there be darkness over the land of Egypt—darkness that may be felt.’” (Ex. 10:21)

Edited and translated by Anthony Hatzidakis from a transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki and Mr. Athanasios K.

Greek text source: Aktines, Audio source: Arnion.gr

.

Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

THE RESURRECTION OF OUR YOUTH

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Brooklyn_Museum_-_The_Resurrection_of_the_Widow%27s_Son_at_Nain_%28La_r%C3%A9surrection_du_fils_de_la_veuve_de_Na%C3%AFm%29_-_James_Tissot_-_overall.jpg
Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered the following homily on October 19, 1986, the Third Sunday of Luke (7:11-16). The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations. | Father Athanasios was the abbot of the Monastery of Komnenion in Larissa, Greece.

Homily of Blessed Elder Athanasios Mitilinaios

THE RESURRECTION OF OUR YOUTH

Luke (7:11-16)

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

The scene, my beloved, of the resurrection of the widow’s son in Naïn, is described simply, but very vividly. By His word alone, the Lord resurrected the lad who was the only child of that poor, widowed woman. He said to him, “Young man, I say to you, get up!” And the young man came back to life.

Fear seized the people and they were astounded, as the holy Evangelist Luke narrates to us. And the people, quite rightly, drew the conclusion: “a great prophet has arisen among us; God has visited His people” (v.16).

However, my beloved, the youth of today submit to a worse kind of death, spiritual death. When a young person dies a biological death, we all say, “O what a shame that a young person died”, and there is much mourning. How much more mourning should there be when not one person, but all the youth have died. It is appropriate to wail much over the death of the youth and to shed many tears.

When we walk down the street and see these living dead who belong to our youth, I assure you, the soul cries, certainly the souls of all who understand what has happened cry, those who can feel and mourn. They mourn when they see the dead young people who belong to the new generation passing by, those who are from our children.

If, however, my beloved, the Lord performed at least three resurrections (the number recorded in the holy Gospels), He probably resurrected many more spiritually dead people. He performed, and performs, and will continue to perform these resurrections. But let us take a closer look at how the holy text is narrated to us.

The holy Evangelist says that when that funeral procession was exiting the city gate of Naïn, the Lord was entering, accompanied by a very large crowd who admired Him and were following Him. The Lord, seeing all the mourning, said to the mother, “Don’t cry” and then, “approaching the casket”, the holy Evangelist says, “he touched it”, that is, the casket, and the corpse which was inside it. One sees here that Jesus Christ needed to approach the dead youth.

We often say, “Jesus must reach the youth.” What does this mean? That this approach is made by the grace of God when God gives His Grace. Just as the rays of the sun come down and touch objects and persons, so do the rays of divine Grace come and touch and caress us. But the second element must also come, the living word of God, offered by the Church.

So then, two elements are needed, the Grace of God and the living word of the Church of God. This living word, which comes from the outside and is offered, must find contact points. Notice, the Lord says, “touched” the corpse. Therefore, the word of God must find these contact points with the dead youth. However be careful here, because when we say “contact points” it does not mean that the Church will throw away its principles to win over the youth. There is a misunderstanding here. We say, “Let’s introduce instruments in church because our kids love music; it will be a way to attract them to our services.” So, because we understand they like the beat of rock music we are going to introduce rock music to attract the kids? This is surely a mistake, my beloved. “What do you do in church?”, we ask. “We find the word of God to be the contact point between the Church and the people of God, especially the youth.” There can be no compromise.

It has been proven abundantly that when the word of God is offered solid, pure and unadulterated, with much love, love that reaches and exceeds the bounds of self-sacrifice, then these contact points are created. We do not need to change anything. It is enough that this word of God be alive, pure, and, I repeat, with love; because the soul seeks what is true, what is offered sincerely and with love. Therefore, when we say “approach” and “find contact points”, in no way does this mean that we must make compromises and concessions, so that we end up reaching them through a dialectical way, and if we offer it this way it does not save. There is no need to offer the word of God if it does not save and offer a Church that does not save.

“Young man,” says the Lord. How beautiful this address of the Lord is. It is not his name, but his age that is revealed. Indeed, adolescence is the most beautiful age, but also the toughest and most difficult. It often happens that when one grows up he looks back on his life, to the days of his youth, and reminisces. However when he reflects how difficult his life was, he does not wish to go back to those days. He was faced with many existential problems.

A young man stops to consider his life in front of him and wonders who he is, who the others are, who God is, what existence means. Does he have a soul or does he not have a soul? What is the destiny of man? What is the meaning of life? These so-called “existential problems” are agonizing for a young person who ponders them. Even the most carefree youth has moments where he reaches a dead-end. He asks himself, “Is life worth living or not?”

There are job-related problems. We see this clearly in our children. What will they pursue? and how will they achieve what they wish to pursue?

There are moral problems. My oh my, are there moral problems!

There are problems of a spiritual nature: “What path will I follow? How will I be guided in my life?”

There are interpersonal problems. We emphasize this last one, because we see it vividly in our days. My beloved, we see young people not having a good relationship with their parents, with their home life in general, with the Church and with society. Anarchism, in those who are lackadaisical and say, “I don’t care”, “What does it matter”, “I am who I am and no one else in the world matters” creates terrible interpersonal problems. These problems are so great, that if they were the only ones we had, we would say that all the others are unnecessary. But we can say that all the other problems are found in this one, which is why we have the problem of acidic relationships.

But who will solve these problems? Who else but Jesus Christ? Our youth must realize that they labor in vain in their pursuits, in materialistic and political theories, in pleasures and drugs. They labor in vain. They will not find anything there. All such paths lead to a dead end, to chaos. Therefore the voice of the Lord comes:

Young man / young woman, I am talking to you, I who am the Incarnate Son of God, I who was a baby, I who was a teenager and a young man, who also passed through all the phases of human development, including the one you are now passing through; I am He who has learned from what I passed through, from what I have suffered. I who was tempted in life, I who was tempted by the devil (Mt. 4, Lk. 4) (who tempts you too), but whom I defeated. I have also overcome the world (Jn. 16:33), and I have overcome the devil by remaining without sin.

My young brother / young sister1, I am addressing you personally. You who live the spiritual crisis of your time so strongly. You who have deep experiences of sin. You who have even turned against Me. I am turning to you, My young brother / my young sister.

I consider you My friend, and I want to help you. No one else can help you and raise you up from being dead. Turn to Me, do not war against Me, but to listen to Me. What do I have to say to you? GET UP! Arise! Young man / young woman, I say to you, arise! Get up! Stand up! Yes! Get up! I who am your Lord, who created you to be in an upright posture, which is an expression; because you walk on your own two feet, it expresses that you yourself are king and ruler of everything. Yes. This is why you call Me Lord, “Lord of lords.” (Deut 10:17, Ps. 136:3, Rev. 17:14, 19:16, 1 Tim 6:15)

Who am I Lord over? The rulers of men. This is why you also call me “King of kings.” (Rev. 17:14, 19:16, 1 Tim 6:15) Who are my subjects as King? Those who rule. Who are those who rule? All the people. Because you humans are lords and kings, and I am Lord of lords and King of kings. This then, the upright posture, how I created you to be, is an expression of My own image in your being.

This upright posture moreover is an expression of one who searches for Me, your Creator. It expresses a way to live your life that is different from the life of the other animals. Therefore, being truly honored, you should not compare yourself with the animals, neither should you stoop to their level and wish to be like them. You are of noble origin. Do not fall into passions which equate you with the animals. I gave you all the good things of Creation. Look no further. I have given you wine to gladden your heart (Ps 103:15). Do not get drunk. I have given you bread to strengthen your heart (v.15). Do not be a gormandizer. I have given you all the beautiful things of life to enjoy, and your senses also. Do not gather in the fruit of prostitution. Do not go and become one who hunts for the pleasures of this life. Be careful. When you do these things, in spite of being an honored creation, you resemble the animals. But there is something more: You descend lower than the animals.

Death is what makes a man lay horizontal, when a man becomes a corpse. But I am Life and I am here to say to you: “Young man, get up! Young woman, get up! In your days, my young friends, people are “walking on all fours”, even though I created them to walk with two! And because they walk on all fours, they are not able to look high up. In fact, they only consider what they see; and what they don’t see, they ignore! All they see is whatever is down, because they are looking down all the time. They see whatever is material. Whatever they see that is passionate, that is how they live. Walking around on all fours, they cannot raise their mind and heart towards Me, to seek Me and to recognize Me. Young man / young woman, you are living in a time when people are walking on all fours.”

Beloved, this is how the Lord speaks to every young person, to our youth. But we, the grown-ups… woe to us grown-ups… we grown-ups are the ones who drive the youth to the cemetery to bury them. We are the ones carrying the caskets of the youth. The youth do not lose their lives by themselves. We the grown-ups have taken away the reins, we have removed the “do not’s”, the laws, the commandments, the guardrails and tell them that they are free, that they can do whatever they want and go wherever they wish. Even if they turn against us and spit on us, we still say to them: “You are doing fine, dear children!” We, then, are the ones who removed all these, the reins of God’s law and of reason and of humanity. And the youth have come to rebel.

But when the Lord, my beloved, approached the casket of that young man of Naïn, the holy Evangelist says: “The pallbearers stood still.” (v.14) Yes. Let us also stop the pallbearers who are carrying the youth. Yes, the youth, the new people, His “new people being built up”, as the Psalmist says (Psalm 101:19). We are the ones who lead the youth to physical as well as spiritual death with our morally corrupt laws, with our corrupted logic, with out corrupt teaching, with the deadly directions we give to our young men and women, with the apostasy we have created. Let us stop. Let us give Christ the opportunity to approach our dead youth and He will resurrect them and return them to the mother Church, their mother, their homeland. At some point may we realize that only Christ raises the dead, those who are physically dead and those who are spiritually dead, because He is the resurrection and the Life (Jn 11:25).

  1. Heb. 2:11 : “For both He that sanctifies and those who are sanctified are all of one; therefore He is not ashamed to call them brethren…”)
Translated from Greek by Anthony Hatzidakis, October 7, 2023 from a transcription by Ms. Eleni Linardaki. Source: Aktines
Photo of author

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

MAKE A BEGINNING

Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios of blessed memory (+2006) delivered the following homily for the First Sunday of Luke on September 23, 1990 (Luke 5:1-11). The homily was delivered in a free manner and recorded live. Most of the scriptural quotations are not direct quotations.

Homily of Blessed Elder Athanasios Mitilinaios

“MAKE A BEGINNING”

fr athanasios mitilinaios
Blessed Fr. Athanasios Mitilinaios

On the first Sunday after the Exaltation of the Holy Cross, my beloved, our Church begins to read passages from the Gospel according to St. Luke. Today’s Gospel passage tells us about the beginning of our Lord’s public work and the choosing of His first disciples. Therefore our theme will be the importance of a beginning in any area of our lives, especially in the area of our salvation. Let us look at the Gospel passage and say a couple of words about it to have a better picture.

One morning, on the sandy beach of Lake Gennesaret, the Lord saw two moored boats. Peter with his brother Andrew were in one and James and John his brother were in the other. The Lord asked the Apostle Peter to use his boat for a little while because a great number of people had come to hear Him speak, and since it was not possible for Him to be seen and heard, He asked to speak to the multitude from the boat.

After talking to the crowd, the Lord urged Peter to put the boat into out into the sea to do some fishing. It was midday. Although it was not an opportune time of day to go fishing, Peter obeyed and, shortly after, the net was torn from the great number of fish, so many that they had to call over to James and John to help. Both of the boats were close to sinking from the weight of so many fish. The apostle Peter, like the others, was beside himself; “they were astonished” (5:9) says the Evangelist Luke. And the LORD said to Peter (who was still Simon): “Don’t be afraid. From now on you will be fishing for men; and when they had brought their boats to shore, they left everything and followed Him.” (5:10-11) So we see the Lord making a beginning of preaching the Gospel. Not that very day, but in those days. His first four disciples also began their sacred missionary work, after they “had left everything”. So we sense the spirit of a beginning, the spirit of something starting. …

The creation of the world also had a beginning. The God-inspired Moses writes: “In the beginning God made the heavens and the earth.” (Gen 1:1). Of course this “in the beginning” means nothing else but time and, consequently, a start, for time did not exist. The very moment God created space and matter, He also created time. He did not create one before the other. And as Origen says: “The name “beginning” can be used even for the beginning of the universe.” 1 I will add, it is a most appropriate name for the creation of the universe, more than any other beginning.

And, as St. Cyril of Jerusalem says (and I digress a little from my main subject because it is a beautiful statement of St. Cyril): “The beginning of the world is water and the beginning of the Good News is the Jordan.”2 Do you see? The beginning of the world is water. The beginning of the Good News, preaching, is the Jordan River. Because after His baptism, the Lord began to preach.This “beginning of the world” he says is “water” (again, allow me a little digression from my main subject, for it is an extremely interesting point). If we read the pre-Socratic philosophers, we will see that each one of them philosophized on the subjects of cosmology and theology, that is, on the world and God. We will also see that each one attributes one element or another as the starting point of creation; one says fire, one says water, etc..

Holy Scripture tells us that the beginning of Creation is water. It makes an impression, because it appears to be a simple substance. Allow me to explain what the Apostle Peter is saying (as I told you, I digress so you can learn a little something). The Apostle Peter, in his Second Epistle says: “the heavens and earth were created of old; by the word of God the earth was formed out of water and by water” (3:5) It is amazing! Pay attention, so that you can understand. The ancient world, they used Holy Scripture with whatever knowledge they had in those days. It was not able, for example, to talk about oxygen and hydrogen. But it is quite obvious that when the Apostle Peter says “it was created out of water and by water”, today we understand very clearly that “water” is hydrogen and oxygen.

We know very well that hydrogen is that which receives the proton in its nucleus, and it makes the elements of the universe. Here, then is the first element, hydrogen, which is contained in water and in a greater amount than oxygen. When we say H2O (two hydrogen and one oxygen), we say it is water – amazing! And then, what forms the surface of the earth? Again, water. The clouds, the waters, the oceans, “from water and by water”. Do you see the precision of Scripture? It is amazing.

All created things have a beginning. Certainly life as a phenomenon had a beginning. By a word from God, the plant and animal kingdoms came into being, and man also (Gen. 1:11-27). Each human being that comes into the world has a beginning, and there is always something fascinating about a beginning,  a beauty. Why? Because within it there is hope for the creation and for its success. This is why every man who begins a work fascinates.

The beginning of man is Christ. His beginning, St. Justin says, is in Christ’s will. Christ willed it and He made us. Man owes the beginning of his human form to Christ. Origen says: Christ is the beginning of those who were made in the image of God.”3 What does this mean? It means that the prototype or archetype was the Logos of God, soon to incarnate, the basis on which man came to be. Jesus Christ, that is, was not made based on Adam. Adam was made based on Jesus Christ.

Therefore, the beginning of man, of existence, the human form, “man”, is not the word spoken by God; he has as a beginning Jesus Christ. Because when we say “Jesus Christ”, we mean the Logos of God become man. And God wills this beginning and every beginning to be good. Just as He is good, whatever He creates is also good. But when God made a beginning in the creation of man, He also made a beginning of man’s freedom. Observe here, because we are entered into an adventure. That is, God left the development of a man’s life up to him: How do you want your life to unfold? I leave you to direct your own life, O man!” This is the mystery of freedom, which is astonishing. My beloved, all my life, from the time I was a teenager, I have studied the subject of freedom and, still, I have not grasped it. So God put life in the hands of man. How? He gave him the authority to make a beginning of his own works. We say: “We will build a house.” We say: “We will have children.” We say: “We will plant a garden.” But now that a man’s life is self-directed, it is also his obligation to make a beginning in his life in all things.

In “Ecclesiastes” it is stated abundantly, “There is a time for everything” (3:1-8), a time to plant, a time to uproot, a time to pull down, a time to build, etc. Indeed, this “a time for everything” here implies that there is a beginning in everything man does. Because when he speaks about moments, he is speaking of time. It also means that, truly, the beginning is in the hands of man, and the first beginning which man must make is to begin his salvation. God also implanted this in Adam. When he told him to work, what did He tell him to work? Paradise which he was enjoying there all prepared? (Gen 1:15) He meant the paradise of his soul. And what fruit was he supposed to bear? (After all, the earth was watered by itself, as the God-inspired Moses tells us.4) What fruit did he have to bear? The fruit of virtues. Consequently, because he was not careful and lost Paradise, he now he has to force himself to make a beginning of his return back to Paradise. He must turn back.

The Gospel of Mark begins as follows: “The beginning of the Gospel of Jesus Christ, Son of God.” (Mk. 1:1) The beginning of the Gospel. What does this say? That this beginning was made by God, in order to help you repent. That is, it enables you, urges you, pushes you to make one more beginning, the beginning of repentance. God makes a beginning to save and you must make a beginning to repent. The Apostle Paul says to the Athenians: God overlooked the times of ignorance (the days of idol worship, etc.) and now He orders people everywhere to repent (to change their ways, to turn back). (Acts 17:30) We must continually make a beginning of repentance.

The ascetics used to say: “I will make a beginning.”5 It is said of St. Abba Sisoës (July 6) that when he was dying, all of his disciples had gathered around his deathbed. He begged them to leave him alone for a little while so that he could make a beginning of repentance! And as soon as they went away for a little while, he passed away. And he shone with the uncreated light and the place was filled with a sweet fragrance. He had been sanctified, yet he said: “Leave me a for a little while so that I may make a beginning of repentance.” That is what we also must say. We should never say: “I am saved.” No. Make a beginning of repentance, my beloved.

We once began our spiritual life when we were Baptized, but since then we have soiled our baptismal garment. We must make a beginning to cleanse our baptismal garment, and this beginning is to repent and to go to confession. Have we fallen? Begin to stand up straight. Have we fallen again? Begin to correct yourself. Have we fallen again? Whenever we fall, we will get up. Be very attentive to this point. Do not let someone take advantage of it in a cunning and foolish way and say: “It doesn’t matter. I’ll fall again anyhow. I’m going to let myself fall and not be concerned about it anymore.”

Sometimes the pitcher goes down into the well and doesn’t come back up; it breaks. What if death finds you this way? You don’t know. When will you bear fruit then, my brothers and sisters? When? For repentance is not only a word. The act of repenting, says St. John the Baptist, is the fruit. “bear fruit worthy of repentance.” (Lk. 3:8) It is not in our interest to fall, but when we do fall, we can get up; we can repent and get up and begin again. In our inner world also, our sinful thoughts and feelings. We will say, “Leave. Don’t bother me. I am making a beginning of repentance.”

When a man begins his life, the acquisition of virtues is projected upon him. We raise our child and tell him that he must live the virtues we learn about in the Holy Gospel. But they seem difficult to him and there are many of them. What will he do? He will make a beginning. Simple. And the beginning, it is well known, is half the battle. Have you made a beginning? You have done half the work! But the devil knows all too well the value of beginning a work. Therefore, in every undertaking, he plots and schemes in order to frustrate that beginning. He encourages you to think: I can do that later. I know this or that.

He always creates some excuse, some obstacle. He puts negligence in front of a man’s beginning. Spiritual laziness. And negligence, my beloved, I must tell you, is fought with violence. Idleness is what inertia is to mass. As Physics tells us, more energy must be expended for a body at rest to be put in motion. This is what negligence is in our spiritual life. I will tell you a great lesson. Listen here: The beginning of the beginning is violence! We will put violence at the beginning of every work of ours. And this violence is good and necessary. That is why the Lord says, “the kingdom of God is entered violently, and the violent take it by force.” (Mt. 11:12)

The devil also practices another trick. He arrives at the beginning of every work to show us that it is immense and impossible, that it is too great. Am I so great as to fulfill the commandments of the Gospel?

There was a father who sent out his child into the field to plow. So the child went, but when he saw the great expanse of the field he was discouraged and turned back. Fine, his father says to him. So the next morning they went to the field together and the father says to his son, I want you to dig for me right here this many square meters, no more than that, and come home when it is evening. In this way, with this approach, the entire field was plowed.

There is even a beginning when developing a talent. The talent is like gold (the currency of antiquity), raw gold. There must, therefore, be a beginning to refine it. This is indicated where God says, “Open your mouth wide and I will fill it.” (Ps. 80:11) Observe, God will put in the content of His word, but only after I have opened my mouth. And indeed, characteristically, He does not say “open” but He says “widen”; which means that you will work more. When you approach to receive Holy Communion and you open your mouth we the priests say to you: “Open wider.” Wider, as wide as it goes. That is, you will work on your talent as much as possible, and then God will make use of it.

It is the same with a pencil when you begin to write. “What will I write?” you say. Just take the paper and pencil, begin, and you will write. Do you see, the value of a beginning is great for everyone, for the student, for the scientist, for the one who starts his family, for the one who starts a profession—a beginning is very important!

Of course, man can make many beginnings and establish his life, but the most important one is the beginning of holiness. God commands: “Be holy, for I am holy.” (Lev 10:44,45; 1 Pet 1:16) But wanting to become holy does not stop at desiring it. It begins with the little things: beginning to stop little bad habits and beginning to start little good habits. We should also start with willing it. The Apostle Paul says: “Without holiness, no one will be able to see the Lord.” (Heb 12:14) We must, therefore, make a beginning.

Beloved, one morning at Lake Gennesaret, some milestone events happened. The Lord began preaching. He chose His first disciples. He preached repentance as the beginning of our return to God as the way to begin of our new life. He preached and with this wanted to remind us that we too must make a beginning, a beginning in everything, but above all, in holiness.

The Lord divided time into small pieces for our sake in order to help us, like the father who divided the field into small pieces for his child so that he could plow it and not see the great amount of work. He divided it by time, with a sunset and a sunrise. He divided time into years so we can measure the span of our lives: What I did last year, what I’m doing this year, what I can do this year. Moreover, He also divided it into moments, for us to remember the Lord, for us to return to Him and repent continually.

My brothers and sisters, let us make a beginning in everything, and above all, let us make a beginning in repentance and holiness. By making a beginning we complete half of the work, but we will experience all the joy. So let us make a beginning, and the Lord Jesus, who for our sake became a beginning in time with His Incarnation, will surely help us.

Amen.

  1. Commentary on the Gospel of John 2.4.36
  2. Catechesis for those to be illumined 3.5
  3. Commentary on the Gospel of John, Volume I, 1.17.104
  4. Gen 2:6 “But there went up a mist from the earth and watered all the land.”
  5. Saint Gregory Palamas: “You should make a beginning of a more perfect life and renew and prepare yourself for the reception of the eternal blessings to come.” (A New Testament Decalogue, Philokalia, Vol. 4)St. Mark the Ascetic: “Everything that happens has a small beginning, and grows the more it is nourished.” (On the Spiritual Law, Two Hundred Texts, #171, Philokalia, Vol. 1)St Diadochos of Photiki: “At the beginning of the struggle, therefore, the holy commandments of God must be fulfilled with a certain forcefulness of will (cf. Matt. 11:12); then the Lord, seeing our intention and labor, will grant us readiness of will and gladness in obeying His purposes. For ‘it is the Lord who makes ready the will’ (Prov. 8:35. LXX), so that we always do what is right joyfully. Then shall we truly feel that ‘it is God who energizes in you both the willing and the doing of His purpose’ (Phil. 2:13).” (On Spiritual Knowledge and Discrimination One Hundred Texts, #93, Vol. 1)“When the heart feels the arrows of the demons with such burning pain that the man under attack suffers as if they were real arrows, then the soul hates the passions violently, for it is just beginning to be purified. It if does not suffer greatly at the shamelessness of sin, it will not be able to rejoice fully in the blessings of righteousness. He who wishes to cleanse his heart should keep it continually aflame through practicing the remembrance of the Lord Jesus.” (On Spiritual Knowledge and Discrimination One Hundred Texts, #97, Vol. 1)
Translated, edited, adapted, and added emphases by Anthony Hatzidakis
Sources:

Photo of author
Item added to cart.
0 items - 0,00 $