Articles for tag: divine justice, human justice, justice, St. Paisios the New

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

Human justice and Divine justice

The Parable of the Unforgiving Servant1 contains sublime teachings. The parable opens a window for us and we peek at what is truly a divine attribute and characteristic. The parable teaches us primarily about divine justice. God sees our numerous transgressions on His computer screen, but as soon as He reads our email asking for His forgiveness, He hits the delete key, and voila, everything is erased. In the second place the parable teaches us something equally important to us: that unless we forgive our fellow human being any infraction against us, we should not expect God to forgive us our infractions against Him either.

Is it not marvelous, my brothers and sisters in Christ, the magnanimity of the king of the parable? In him we get a glimpse of the kind of “justice” our God has. A justice totally imbalanced–in our favor! I am reminded of a story about this rich man who had not done a single deed of kindness in all his life: a greedy, stingy, unmerciful, selfish creature. Upon dying his guardian angel took his soul and headed for heaven. But on the way the evil spirits claimed it: This soul is ours, they shouted. The good angel went over and over the man’s entire life–and could not find a single good deed. Suddenly, there, just as the demons were ready to snatch his soul from the Angel’s hands, he saw a good deed. Here, he cried joyfully, he gave a loaf of bread to a beggar: he is ours. You see, one time the rich man was chasing a beggar, and he could not find anything else handy to throw at him, but this loaf of bread. The Good Lord reckoned it as charity. Such merciful and forgiving God is our God!

The divine truths about God’s forgiveness, mercy, compassion, tolerance, kindness, and love and our imitation of God in these divine attributes were preached in the Sermon of the Mount from the mouth of the Incarnate Love. The Lord presented to us a God who “makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the righteous and on the unrighteous” (Mt. 5:40). We also hear the condition of forgiveness:

“Forgive, and you will be forgiven; give, and it will be given to you. A good measure, pressed down, shaken together, running over, will be put into your lap; for the measure you give will be the measure you get back” (Lk. 6:37-38).

To illustrate better the divine justice I will now turn to a marvelous book, written by a priest-monk, Fr. Christodoulos from the Holy Mountain. In the book that he wrote, Elder Paisios, he brings us the words of this great contemporary holy Elder, now a declared Saint. These are words of great wisdom, my dear Christians, and offer a great commentary to the divine teachings of the Lord. He writes:

I always had this perplexity, how can a human being become a Saint, and what was that which distinguished our Saints, and for which God engraced them. One day I went to the Elder and asked him: “Yeronda [Elder], what is that which our Saints have, apart from the rest of men, the very thing which sets them apart, and thus enables them to receive God’s grace?” The Elder answered, “Our Saints had the divine justice, not the human justice.” I asked again: “What is, Yeronda, this divine justice?” And he replied with examples full of grace, as follows:2

“Well, say two men sit at table to eat, and in front of them have a plate with ten apricots. If one of the two is a glutton and overindulges eating seven of them leaving three for the other one, then he is at fault, and wrongs the other. This is injustice. But if he says, “It’s the two of us and there are ten apricots, so each one’s share is five, so he eats five and leaves for the other one five, then this man applies the human law and he has the human justice. It is because of this human law that we run many times to the courts, to find it. But if he sees that his brother likes apricots, he will pretend he doesn’t like them. So he may eat one just to save face, saying to the other: “Brother, you eat the rest of the apricots, because I don’t like them very much, and actually they bother me a little, so it would be better if I didn’t eat any more.” Then he has the divine justice, according to which he prefers, in a human way, to suffer injustice. Yet his sacrifice receives more than enough recompense by the divine grace. He receives God’s grace by the bundle.”

Don’t you find this story truly astonishing in its simplicity, yet full of penetrating insight? I was going to stop here, but Elder Paisios has much more to teach us about divine justice. These teachings are simple, but lofty in their simplicity for us who are worldly and carnal. Let’s listen to them:

I will give you one more example, to understand it well. If someone comes and tells me, “Yeronda, this cell is mine, so get out and leave, and go sit outside under the cypress tree, because this cell is mine,” then if I possess divine justice I will accept it with joy and actually I will thank him for the offer he made to me, and allowed me to be under my own tree. But if I possess human justice–and this is what I want to apply in my life–then I will not accept it, and I will begin to argue and fight with him, until we end up in courts–if he won’t be convinced. The true Christian, however, must not prosecute anyone nor sue anyone, even if they take the clothes off his back.

Saint-Paisios-passing-mark
Wisdom from Saint Paisios. Over 100 more graphics like this on our “Living Words” page.

There is only one difference between the Christians and those who do not believe in Christ: The Christians have as their law the divine justice, whereas the unbelievers have human justice. The justice of men is nothing compared to the justice of God. Our Lord applied first this divine justice. Neither when they accused Him did He justify Himself, nor when they spat on Him did He complain, nor when He suffered to be accused, but He bore everything patiently and quietly, without reacting at all. He even allowed to be deprived of His clothes, and thus God was mocked naked before His creation. Most important of all, however, not only did He not demand help from the human law, but to the contrary, He justified His persecutors to His Father, and prayed for them, to be forgiven: “Father, forgive them; for they do not know what they are doing” (Lk. 23:34). We, however, do not look at the example of our God, and thus we do not stop suing other people, unless we get back the things we claim, and then some at times, especially when, before we collect the debt, we collect the interest. The result is that our right becomes the beginning of a great injustice.

Let us examine our lives, my dear Christians, and let us make the necessary adjustments we need to make. Let us seek God’s divine justice and grow in imitation of our merciful, kind, generous, forgiving and loving God, and we will not be deprived of any good thing. Amen.

Fr. E.H./2010

  1. The Gospel According to Matthew 14:22-34

    At that time, Jesus made the disciples get into the boat and go before him to the other side, while he dismissed the crowds. And after he had dismissed the crowds, he went up into the hills by himself to pray. When evening came, he was there alone, but the boat by this time was many furlongs distant from the land, beaten by the waves; for the wind was against them. And in the fourth watch of the night he came to them, walking on the sea. But when the disciples saw him walking on the sea, they were terrified, saying, “It is a ghost!” And they cried out for fear. But immediately he spoke to them, saying “Take heart, it is I; have no fear.”

    And Peter answered him, “Lord, if it is you, bid me come to you on the water.” He said, “Come.” So Peter got out of the boat and walked on the water and came to Jesus; but when he saw the wind, he was afraid, and beginning to sink he cried out, “Lord, save me.” Jesus immediately reached out his hand and caught him, saying to him, “O man of little faith, why did you doubt?” And when they entered the boat, the wind ceased. And those in the boat worshiped him, saying, “Truly you are the Son of God.” And when they had crossed over, they came to land at Gennesaret.

    (Source: GOARCH.org)

  2. I ask you to please pay particular attention to the following simple words, which I find to be among the most remarkable I have read anywhere, full of divine wisdom.

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

How Patriarch Bartholomew is walking away from Christ

assisi-statement

Οn the occasion of the 30th anniversary of the annual World Day of Prayer for Peace organized in Assisi on Sept. 18-20, 2016, Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew released a statement in Italian to “Avvenire,” a newspaper of the Catholic bishops of Italy, entitled, “That all may become one, ‘ut unum sint.’” This year’s theme was, “Thirst for peace: Religions and Cultures in Dialogue.” Before getting to the Patriarch’s message and my commentary I would like to offer a few introductory remarks.

At the first World Day of Prayer for Peace in 1986, 160 religious leaders were gathered, representing 32 Christian groups and 11 non-Christian religions, “spending the day together with fasting and praying to their God or Gods.” Pope Benedict in 2011 did not allow a common prayer, because he didn’t want to convey the impression “that theological differences have been reduced or are not consequential.” However, he concluded his own reflection saying, “In the name of God, may every religion bring upon the earth justice and forgiveness and life, love!”—a full syncretistic prayer, I should add. How could prayer be absent from an event that takes place for the very purpose of praying for peace? This year’s event gathered more than 450 religious leaders of different faiths.

Here follows the Patriarch’s statements and my commentary:

“It’s been 30 years since Pope John Paul II gave start to the Assisi events, events of contemplation and decisions for the religions that work and walk together toward global peace…

The heretical Pope gave the start to unite all the religions under him, and our Patriarch readily and foolishly ran after him. This initiative sounds noble and innocent, but it constitutes a great deception. In the first place, the Patriarch doesn’t call it for what it is. It is not convened to “work and walk together toward global peace,” but it is a “day of prayer for peace.” There is a problem right there, because Orthodox people are prevented from praying together with non-Orthodox, especially with non-Christians! Besides, I don’t think the mission of the Church is to “work and walk together (with the religions of the world) toward global peace.” St. John the Theologian said, “he who says he abides in Him ought to walk in the same way in which He walked.” (1 John 2:6) Christ didn’t work, and His followers the Saints didn’t “work and walk together” with the religions of the world. The Lord said, “If any one serves me, he must follow me.” (John 12:26) Who does the Patriarch follow? Who does he serve?In the second place, reflect on this year’s theme, “Religions and Cultures in Dialogue.” What is the purpose of this “dialogue”? It is not so much about peace as it is “to walk together” with the religions of the world, united under the Pope, so “there shall be one flock and one shepherd”—not Christ, but the Pope! No acceptance of the same Shepherd, our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ is needed. Everyone is free to believe whatever each one wants. Pope Francis is frantically working to unite all religions under him and create the One World Religion and the New World Order.

…This year, the 25th anniversary of our humble ministry on the patriarchal throne of Constantinople, we are glad we are able to be together with our brothers and our sisters of other denominations and communities of Christian faith,…

“Behold, how good and pleasant it is when brothers dwell in unity!” (Ps. 133:1). Indeed, our Patriarch should be glad to be together with his brothers, as the psalmist says. The problem is, these were not his brothers. Christians have always addressed as “brothers” those who share the same faith with them. The Apostle Paul explained to the Corinthians that when he urged them “not to associate with any (immoral man) who bears the name of brother,” he didn’t mean the “outsiders.” (1 Cor. 5:9.11.12) “Brothers and sisters” is equivalent to being all children of God, treated in another post. We address as “brothers” only those who are united with us in faith, having become children of God through faith in Jesus Christ and baptism (see Gal. 3:26-27). Instead, our Patriarch persecutes the true Orthodox, rejoicing in the company of non-Orthodox Christians.But it gets worse. The Patriarch knows that at this particular gathering he is not only among his “brothers” of various Christian denominations, but also among “brothers” of other faiths. Again, let us repeat: this gathering is for the Babylon of Religions and Cultures of the world to Dialogue. So the question arises: how does our Patriarch reconcile these efforts with the words of the Apostle: “Do not be mismated with unbelievers. For what partnership have righteousness and iniquity? Or what fellowship has light with darkness? What accord has Christ with Belial? Or what has a believer in common with an unbeliever? What agreement has the temple of God with idols?” (2 Cor. 6:14-16) I would love to have an answer from our Patriarch.

…guided by our beloved Pope Francis, …

“Our”? “Beloved”? Aren’t these expressions of endearment going a little too far? “Pope”? So now we officially recognize the “usurper” (according to Metropolitan Seraphim of Piraeus) of the see of Peter as the legitimate Pope? “Guided”? Do we already accept the Pope as the first (primus), and follow him as our guide (pastor)? We do love everyone, as the Lord commands us, and we pray that everyone may come to the knowledge of truth, and thus be saved. But we should not give to heterodox (heretical and schismatic Christians) false hopes that being in heresy and schism (as they are), and being cut off from the Body of Christ (as they are) doesn’t matter. If we fail to evangelize them we fail in our mission.

…in a meeting and in a shared commitment—citing the Orthodox Divine Liturgy—“for the peace from above” and “for the peace of the whole world.” It is particularly appropriate that this international event is hosted by the Diocese of Assisi, the Franciscan family and our dear friends of the Sant’ Egidio Community.…

The following words written by blessed Elder, St. Paisios the Hagiorite about Patriarch Athenagoras are also applicable in this case:

“My writings are nothing more than an expression of my deep pain for the line and, unfortunately, the worldly love of our father Mr. Athenagoras. As shown, he loved another woman, who is modern, called Papal ‘Church,’ because our Orthodox Mother does not impress him, because she is very modest… With such an almost worldly love our Patriarch arrives in Rome. And while he should show love first toward us his children and toward our Mother Church, unfortunately he sent his love very far. The result was to comfort all his secular children who love the world and have this worldly love, but scandalize all of us, the children of Orthodoxy, young and old, who have fear of God.”

Patriarch Bartholomew is a faithful follower of his predecessor, Patriarch Athenagoras, who has fallen madly in love with “the great harlot” (Rev. 17:1), wallowing with her in the mud.

…We have recently witnessed this deep desire to heal our human community and protect our planet when the world mourned the loss of life and beauty in the earthquake that hit central Italy. We recognize, then, that peace is something for which we yearn with great passion and great pain.…

The Lord said, “Peace I leave with you; My peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you.” (John 14:27) Our request in our services (quoted above by the Patriarch) is to receive “the peace from above.” Peace is a surety given us from Christ, which springs from our faith and hope in Him and His promises. “Let the peace of Christ rule in your hearts, to which indeed you were called in the one body” (Col. 3:15). Yet the peace the Patriarch so ardently pursues is a worldly peace. Instead of turning his eyes to heaven to seek “the peace from above,” he keeps them on earth, and together with “the religions that work and walk together toward global peace” he strives to achieve earthly peace with human means, thus turning his back to the “Prince of peace.” (Is. 9:6)

…Many of you are surely aware of how over the last 50 years there have been taken some extraordinary steps toward reconciliation between the Roman Catholic Church and the Orthodox Churches.…

This is the first of no less than four times the word “reconciliation” is used in this short statement. Unfortunately, the steps taken towards reconciliation are in the wrong direction. Do you know what our Patriarch means when he says reconciliation? As “unity in diversity.” There is only one way for reconciliation: for the Roman Catholics and all the heterodox to re-join the Orthodox (true) Church. Our Patriarch has not made a single step to encourage them to move in that direction. To the contrary, he tells his Roman Catholic “brothers” that they are fine where they are, the way they are, and that dogmatic differences are “misunderstandings.”

…We owe the start to the popes John XXIII and Paul VI, as well as to our predecessors, Ecumenical Patriarchs Athenagoras and Demetrios. Their vision has reminded us all of the urgent exhortation of the Lord to his disciples on the Mount of Olives, “that all may be one” (ut unum sint).…

Correction, Your All Holiness: It is not an “urgent exhortation” of the Lord, but a fervent request to His Father. Please, reread His words: “I am praying for them [His disciples]; I am not praying for the world but for those whom thou hast given me… keep them in thy name…that they may be one, even as we are one.” (John 17:9.11) Christ prays for His disciples, that they may “remain united” (Prof. P. Trembelas), that they may maintain the unity they already have – not strive to achieve a unity they don’t have. The unity prayed for is unity of faith and love. The Apostle Paul says, “Peace be to the brethren, and love with faith, from God the Father and the Lord Jesus Christ.” (Eph. 6:23)

…However there is another reconciliation, a unity of action, which is concern for the suffering we see around us in the world.…

Here is the great apostasy, here is a radical departure from the Tradition of the Church. The Patriarch has cleverly devised another kind of reconciliation. A reconciliation not based on faith but on action. Unfortunately, this other unity is a human construct, which noble as it may be is not the main mission of the Church, but a deviation and a departure from the unity and the reconciliation Christ came to bring us: “God…through Christ reconciled us to Himself and gave us the ministry of reconciliation; that is, in Christ God was reconciling the world to Himself…and entrusting to us the message of reconciliation. So we are ambassadors for Christ.” (2 Cor. 5:18-20) This should be our top priority, and especially the top priority of His All Holiness. This “other reconciliation,” the “unity of action” he pursues, constitutes the greatest threat for the faithful, because it bypasses the truth (that is Christ), acting on a purely human level. He should examine himself, if he faithfully carries out this ministry, this diakonia – if he is a true ambassador for Christ or His betrayer.

…Indeed the principle that underlies openness and dialogue is that all human beings, in the end, face the same challenges. Such dialogue draws people from different religions and cultures out of isolation, preparing them for coexistence and a relationship of mutual respect.…

So the “Great Commission” (“Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you” (Mt. 28:19-20)) is marginalized and is being supplanted by the “principle,” “all human beings face the same challenges.” “Make disciples” is replaced by “mutual respect.” “In the end,” religions don’t make any substantial difference – the Orthodox Church included. The true Church founded by Christ is replaced by the belief in a “new humanity,” in a New World Order, promoted by the Patriarch’s guide, Pope Francis. (July 31, 2016 speech at the World Youth Day.) To both of them, one religion is the same as another. To remain firm in the faith the Patriarch calls it “isolation.” It is terrible to sacrifice our faith in Christ our true God on the worldly altar of the pseudo-religion of ecumenism and syncretism.

…This is why the Holy and Great Council of the Orthodox Church said in its final message: “A sober interreligious dialogue helps to promote mutual trust, peace and reconciliation.” And the encyclical of the Council was even more specific: “We therefore urge all … regardless of religious beliefs, to work for reconciliation and respect for human rights, first of all through the protection of the divine gift of life. War and the bloodshed have to stop, and justice must prevail, so that peace can be restored.”…

Peace and peace and peace; again and again. But what is peace? It’s the same as truth: Christ, “the Lord of peace” (2 Thes. 3:16). Christ spoke clearly: “I have said this to you, that in me you may have peace.” (John 16:33) Yes in Him and in no one and in nothing else. “Peace I leave with you; my peace I give to you; not as the world gives do I give to you.” (John 14:27) In all honesty, whose peace does Patriarch Bartholomew pursue, Christ’s or the world’s?Let us also point out the sober truth, that the Patriarch and his pseudo-council accepted other “heterodox churches,” as if the Lord has founded other churches, besides the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic, Orthodox Church. But that’s only the first step. The second step is to promote and achieve peace and reconciliation among all human beings, “regardless of religious beliefs.”

…This has also been our experience with Pope Francis on the island of Lesbos exactly five months ago, on April 16, 2016. That event was a concrete response of the Churches of the West and the East…

There are no “Churches of the West and the East.” We don’t subscribe to the heretical “two-lung” theory, which is called by Prof. D. Tselengidis “blasphemous.” The Joint Declaration of Lesvos stated that the aim of the participants is “to fulfill the Churches’ [note the plural] mission of service to the world.” The main task of the Church is not social welfare. Let’s not dilute its mission, which is the transformation of mankind and of the entire cosmos.

…to a tragic crisis of our world. At the same time, it was a powerful reaffirmation of how ecumenical relations can promote peace and human rights at a time when the world averts its gaze from extremism and victims of persecution or decides their fate in purely economic or national interests. The power of dialogue and ecumenical action is in starting to go beyond ourselves and what is ours, beyond our community, and our churches.…

We are not opposed to dialogue the aim of which is to proclaim the truth to those willing to hear it. But this kind of dialogue is opposed, even condemned (!) by the ecumenists. Instead, the dialogue they promote is “to go beyond ourselves and what is ours,” meaning to cease to believe that the Orthodox Church is the Church, the one and only Church founded by Christ. Doing so is what they call “isolation,” even extremism.

…It is to learn to speak the language of care and compassion. And it is to give priority to solidarity and service.

It is precisely here where our Patriarch mixes up his priorities and departs from his Apostolic Commission to be Christ’s witness “to the ends of the earth” (Acts 1:8). The Lord charged His Apostles to make disciples of all nations, teaching them to observe all that He commanded them (see Mt. 28:19-20). Is our Patriarch making disciples of all the religious leaders who were present in Assisi?

As we said in another post, our Patriarch does not even believe in making disciples of the Nations, as expressed in his statement: “The Orthodox Church does not seek to convince others on specific perceptions of the Truth or of the Revelation, nor does she seek to convert them to a specific way of thought.” This is not the Martyria that the Lord expects.

Both our Patriarch and like minded ecumenists need to take the Great Commission seriously and make their own St. Paul’s aphorism, “Woe to me if I do not evangelize!” (1 Cor. 9:16)

GIVING WITNESS TO THE TRUE CHURCH

Orthodox Christians all over the world have received the unchanging Christian Faith, passed down from the Holy Apostles to their successors, and continue to practice it today in the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church – The Orthodox Church.
%%tb-image-alt-text%%

What is Orthodox Fundamentalism?

orthodox fundamentalism

Orthodox Fundamentalism? It conjures up sights of militants and extremists. Yet, we are told that Orthodoxy is not immune to this malady that shows its ugly face in every religion, even in atheism. Sometimes the stigma of fundamentalism is ascribed to theologians who faithfully follow the Fathers and abide by the Canons of the Church. A case in point is an article I would like to address.

What are the characteristics of an Orthodox fundamentalist?

  • Typically, fundamentalists view the Bible, or any other book, as the literal word of God.1
  • In its extreme form fundamentalism is fanaticism.
  • Nearly all Old Calendarists are fundamentalists.
  • Most fundamentalists are also fanatics.
  • Separating from the Church on account of the change in the calendar is an extreme form of fundamentalism.
  • Fundamentalists label the New Calendar Orthodox “modernists.”
  • Fundamentalism is encountered mostly in monasteries, but it is most disturbing when it is encountered among the clergy and laity living in the world, who try to imitate the monastic lifestyle.

On January 29, 2015, the Greek Orthodox Archdiocese of America posted an article on its blog2 by Prof. George Demacopoulos3 with the title “Orthodox Fundamentalism.” The article went viral and was also carried by the blog of the Order of St. Andrew the Apostle (2/4/15). As pointed out in his article, aspects of Orthodox fundamentalism abound around us – both in the old continent and in the new World – particularly manifested in biblical literalism and pietism. However, the author labels other legitimate and traditional Orthodox beliefs and practices as fundamentalist, calling them “slavish adherence to a fossilized set of propositions.”

Far from being “used in self-promotion”, as he says, we are all called to follow the teachings and the way of life of the God-bearing Fathers.

Orthodox Fundamentalists?

Demacopoulos inveighs against “so many [unnamed] Orthodox clerics and monks” who “have made public statements that reflect a fundamentalist approach to the Church Fathers,” called by him “extremists” and “radical opportunists.” Who are they? What statements have they made that deserve such epithets? It seems that their fault is that they adhere strictly to the teachings of the Fathers and the Canons of the Church. According to the author’s thinking we should classify the Fathers themselves as fundamentalist, among them St. Photios, St. Mark Evgenikos, St. Gregory Palamas, St. Nikodemos, St. Nektarios and more recently St. Justin Popović and St. Paisios. Certainly in his list belong Protopresbyters George Metallinos, Theodoros Zeses, Vasileios Voloudakis, and Metropolitans Hierotheos of Nafpaktos and Seraphim of Piraeus. Far from being fundamentalist, they express the correct faith, ethos and phronema of the Orthodox Church. The obvious question is, who are the author’s models among the Saints? Could he find even one that espoused what he does?

The Fathers were/are not the “intellectuals of their age,” as the author states, succeeded or rather superseded by the intellectuals of this New Age—presumably the academic scholars. The Fathers expressed their own experiences, having already reached theosis, which is the knowledge of God. These are the words of a contemporary Father, St. Paisios:

Theology is the word of God that is comprehended by pure, humble and spiritually reborn souls. It is not the beautiful words of the mind which are formed with philological artistry and which are expressed with the juridical or worldly spirit…Theology that is taught as a [worldly] science usually examines things historically and consequently understands things externally. Because patristic asceticism and inner experience are absent, this theology is full of doubts and questions. With his mind man is not able to comprehend the divine energies unless he first struggles ascetically to live these energies, so that the grace of God might work within him.

The Fathers do not disagree among themselves, as the author, following the “post-patristic” theologians, attempts to prove (needless to say, without succeeding), but expand, enrich, and deepen upon the teachings of the Fathers that preceded them, as they address, with the grace of the Holy Spirit, new problems that arise. They build upon each other the edifice of the Church. “To refuse to follow the Fathers, not holding their declaration of more authority than one’s own opinion, is conduct worthy of blame, as being brimful of self-sufficiency,” says a great Father of the Church.4 The Church calls the Fathers “the precise custodians of the Apostolic Traditions.”5

Fighting the Fathers

Theology is the word of God that is comprehended by pure, humble and spiritually reborn souls. It is not the beautiful words of the mind which are formed with philological artistry and which are expressed with the juridical or worldly spirit…

Saint Paisios the New

The progressive synchretist and ecumenist professors characterize the attachment to the patristic methodology of defending the Orthodox Faith and attacking and refuting the heresies as fundamentalist, they call the attachment to the Canons of the Church as legalism, the faithful adherence to the Christian ethics as pietism, and the checking of deviations from the pulpit as expressions of hate. This so-called post-patristic theology, far from being a continuation of the theology of the Fathers, constitutes a distortion of their teachings and a radical departure from their witness of the true faith in word and action. It constitutes a resurgence of the rationalist approach to the truth of Barlaamism condemned by the Palamite synods.6

The position taken in this article reflects the post-patristic and deconstructionist spirit that permeates the Theological Academy of Volos (which carried his article, translated by its director) with which the Center co-founded by the author collaborates, which vehemently fights against what was and the way it was “handed down” to us by the Fathers.

We ask:

  • What does Volos and its adherents have to say about the “fundamentalist” Creed and the “fundamentalist” Canons that the “fundamentalist” Fathers have passed on to us?
  • What of our “fundamentalist” dogmas, our “fundamentalist” Divine Liturgy, our “fundamentalist” Bible, our “fundamentalist” hymnology, our “fundamentalist” mysteries (like baptism and communion), and our “fundamentalist” morality?
  • Why reinterpret the Fathers and not reinterpret the antiquated “fundamentalist” faith of the “fundamentalist” Church founded by “fundamentalist” Christ?
  • Why stick to an exclusivist (“fundamentalist”) religion?
  • Why not start afresh with a contemporary expression of the faith? But…that’s what they propose! Unless they shout loud and clear the “fundamentalist” anathemas of the Church on the Sunday of Orthodoxy they have no place in Her.

Keeping the Fundamentals

In the end I would say that perhaps the Orthodox Church has remained “fundamentalist” in the original sense this word had when it was coined by Curtis Lee Laws, the editor of the Northern Baptist newspaper The Watchman-Examiner in 1920, who wrote, “We suggest that those who still cling to the great fundamentals and who mean to do battle royal for the fundamentals shall be called ‘Fundamentalists.’”7

  1. As it is stated succinctly by Cecil McGarry, S.J., “Christian fundamentalism sees the Bible as an encoded message from God, inerrant, infallible, never to be questioned. Its only meaning is the literal meaning of the words. The Bible alone is sufficient and adequate to guide us in all the problems of life, especially religious ones. The only adequate response is absolute and unquestioning obedience to God who is the author of the Bible.” (“A Thin Line Between Fundamentalism and Fanaticism,” Social and Religious Concerns, Ch. 43: 325-335, p. 325.
  2. http://blogs.goarch.org/blog/-/blogs/orthodox-fundamentalism
  3. Prof. George Demacopoulos is Director and Co-Founder of Orthodox Christian Studies Center together with Prof. Aristotle Papanikolaou, with whom he teaches theology at Fordham University, a Jesuit School. He also happens to be an “Archon Didaskalos Tou Genous” of the Order of St. Andrew of the Ecumenical Patriarchate.
  4. None other than Saint Basil, Letters LII.1, NPNF-2, p. 155.
  5. Sunday of the Holy Fathers of the First Ecumenical Council, Doxastikon of Lite.
  6. See the letter of Metropolitan Pavlos of Glyfada to the Synod of Greece of Sept. 28, 2010 on “Contextual,” “Postpatristic” and other “Theological Quests” at the conference of the Theological Academy of Volos on the topic “Neo-Patristic Synthesis or Post-Patristic Theology. The Quest of Contextual Theology in Orthodoxy.” http://www.saintnicodemos.org/articles/postpatristictheology.php.
  7. Curtis Lee Laws, “Convention Side Lights,” The Watchman-Examiner, viii (July 1, 1920), 834.
Item added to cart.
0 items - 0,00 $